Atheistic literature

...

> they don't sound terrible either. Would some kind user mind picking them apart so I can better understand why these are not good arguments to support christianity?

For the trilema, it creates a false dichotomy of sorts in holding that those are the only options, it completely ignores the influence of legend on historical figures which distorts their character and message, given Jesus left no personal writings and that it took the church 400 years to hammer out Jesus and the Trinity (ie him being God) this is a very viable option and the fact that someone with his formal study in literature didnt mention this is very telling.

Secondly this test could be used to demonstrate the truth of almost all religions modern to ancient as almost every prophet or founder meets this test.

The second one is just lazy as it begs the question - ie that people cant have a subjective morality based on thier own frames of reference and not only that ignores all the arguments around how people can derive an objective morality via reason ie like those done by utilitarians or Kant