Logic vs Creativity

Both are the definition of intelligence, but which is much harder ?

Cring, meant more important for a researcher.

Objective thought>subjective emotion

False dichotomy

*tips fedora*

They aren't two parts, much less opposing. There is creativity in logic and logic in creativity. Logic, by it's nature is pretty well defined but creativity is vague as fuck; am I creative if I train myself to think from round about and unconventional perspectives to achieve a goal or perhaps to appear as though I was artful and creating something from nothing?

Prove me wrong.
oh wait you can't without your objective thought

Logic - applying mechanical rules
Creativity - Using rules in non-obvious ways

Physics and mathematics are extremely creative.

Lawyers,artist,musics are extremely logic.

Not the fella you're disagreeing with, but I do think it's worth it for you to note that creativity doesn't always center around emotion. Creativity is a broad word that covers everything from artistic ability to being able to generate novel solutions to problems. Any activity that doesn't require rote memorization will likely involve creativity on some level.

This is true in the scientific world as well. How do you think people come up with testable hypotheses, or improve upon previous experiments?

Without some sort of universally accepted scale of value, it's impossible to say which is better or more important. Especially in an objective, quantifiable manner. In saying one is better than the other without a quantitative reason behind it, you're guilty of thinking with unhinged emotion as well.