>The connection between molecules and life has never actually been made
I dont understand what replication is: the post
>The connection between molecules and life has never actually been made
I dont understand what replication is: the post
His answer > yours
So yeah.
He was intelligent enough to prove his point based on logical points, then proceeded to fuck the user up on a personal level.
What's your problem
>So, what is your opinion on how to falsify theory of evolution by natural selection?
Theory of evolution is: selection and mutation lead to increased fitness. Fitness for what? That depends on the selector. The selector defines what is fit and what is not.
Ok now how do we falsify that? Easy. Write a software to simulate an environment where selection and mutation occur, and see if the 'objects' that are being mutated and selected increase in fitness.
We did that. And guess what the results were? It fucking works, you chimp. It works so well, it is being applied EVERYWHERE. From medicine (vacchine resistancy) to software development (agile/iterated development) to AI to combustion engines.
And only imbeciles like you call it a 'theory'. Everyone else talks simply about 'evolution', and when somebody uses the term 'Theory of Evolution' they are directly refering to the written works of Darwin, not the process of mutation/selection.
tldr: you are a fucking moron
So, are there dank genes, too?