Theory of Evolution Vs. Entropy

Sun jokes, I see. I see.

op didn't ask 'does the theory of evolution contradict 2nd law' so you're answering your own question, not the op.

My bad. It's quite late where I live

s'all good

Man, if only he knew how much fucking work biology is.

here's one for you

how did internal gestation evolve? why not just lay eggs?

Evolution is both fact and theory. However, it's important to understand the distinction between theory and hypothesis -- a theory is based on observable phenomena and empirical evidence that provide the best possible understanding a system. Scientific theories are the most reliable and comprehensive form of scientific knowledge.

It's a fact because we know that evolution (change over time) occurs on the micro scale. We've been able to observe bacteria and other microscopic organisms evolve, even insects. As for Darwinian and Neo-Darwinian evolution, there are disputes and conjecture regarding certain things, but carbon dating and gene mapping have given us a more reliable picture of the time frame... and it's not 6,000 years.

Now, creationism is a H Y P O T H E S I S, and it's a completely unfounded, half-assed, superficial one that's based on nothing but wishful thinking.

Evolution creates organisms that are best fit for their environment. So it seems to create more order over time rather than chaos. You could argue this is a more complicated form of chaos though.

This is a common misconception of entropy.
entropysite.oxy.edu/entropy_isnot_disorder.html

sounds like you're just redefining chaos to mean complex order. that doesn't make sense.