Lightspeed is always the same
>Are you serious bro?
Deadly serious, bro. Why is a question for philosophy, not science. I sort of expanded on that a bit further up . At a certain point you just have to accept that we've reached bedrock, that the universe is just like that and we need to accept it.
No.
>'special relativity' is a fucking fairy tale
>On of the most well tested physical theories ever
>A fucking fairy tale
kek.
All current experimentation and observation tells us FTL transmission of objects or communication is impossible.
There do exist fringe theories about things like tachyons which are particles supposed to travel at FTL speeds but there is no evidence they actually exist and they are not part of any widely accepted theories.
There's also quantum entanglement which may involve an FTL transmission of some kind but it seems to be fundamentally random and uncontrollable so it cannot be used to communicate.
Is there a possibility that we will some day discover something that upends current understanding? Yes, there is always that possibility, but thus far nothing we know of indicates to us that moving an object or a message from point A to point B FTL is possible.
>pure energy
gravity for example is something i would call "pure energy". radioactive rays would be another.
i hope you get what i mean now.
e=mc2
cut out the mass and you have pure energy. basically particle without mass.
can pure energy go faster then light? photons for example. if you put more energy into it will they be able to go even faster?
If our universe had no speed limit but you left everything else the same any object that exceeded C, or whatever the fastest thing that could transmit information was, would be able to break causality.
Light cannot have unlimited speed because it would be anywhere at the same time
>can pure energy go faster then light? photons for example. if you put more energy into it will they be able to go even faster?
No. This has been tested.
>relativity has WHAT merits exactly
It has the merit that it has been proven correct on several occasions, even ones that should be evident to warped brainlets like yourself.
You obviously aren't a scientist, so why do you feel like you have a right to judge whether or not scientific principles are correct? If I was to tell you that the way your GPS works is based exclusively on these principles, and wouldn't work at all without them, would you believe me?
I'm guessing probably not, because you have no concept of how this information was acquired, therefore you place no importance on it. If you actually sat down with an intro physics/math book and tried to learn things, then you might eventually realise how completely ignorant you are.
>I'm too stupid to understand special relativity, but too self-absorbed to see that.
It's funny how stupid people lack self-awareness.
>can pure energy go faster then light? photons for example.
No. You have this thing called the Lorentz (or sometimes gamma) factor, as you start to get closer and closer to the speed of light, the Lorentz factor gets larger and larger. It approaches the speed of light "asymptotically", which is to say, it never quite reaches c.