What is the evidence that humans are directly responsible for climate change? I mean I agree that the Earth is getting warmer. We went through the Ice Age which has been proven to have happened and began almost 1.8 million years ago and just ended approximately 11,700 years ago naturally by itself. The ice had already melted long before Humans started even using Fossil Fuels. We have just started using coal like 200 years ago. That's a pretty short time to impact the earth in such a drastic matter don't you think?
Maybe the Earth just goes through a long cooling process and then a long warming process?
Now if you would kindly rebut the extensive research proving that humans are a leading cause in global warming, i would be happy to engage.
The research is out there and has been for a while by many international and national bodies.
The burden is on climate deniers to explain why the overwhelming evidence is incorrect or wrong in some way, since the evidence exists showing that humans in fact do have a large impact on global warming. Prove me wrong.
Mason Brooks
I'm not denying climate change.
I'm just saying where is the proof that humans are too blame.
Yeah okay nice chart in pic related, but It only goes back 400,000 years.
Pro Tip: The Earth has been around for 4.5 billion years.
It's a pretty bullshit claim to say Earth is in at the highest peak ever when you don't have data for all those years and just only 650,000 years.
"Scientist" today still can't prove how or why the Ice Age happened and we don't know how many cycles of glacial advance and retreat prior to the Ice Age actually occurring.
Andrew Ward
You didn't fucking read anything. The proof is right fucking there you fucking fucker. Fuck. Fuuuuuuck.
I'm too mad today, I'm done. Have fun trolling.
Parker Nguyen
Nasa chart I'm referring to that was inside the source. Forgot to post.
Not an argument.
Connor Perez
>I'm just saying where is the proof that humans are too blame.
You are clearly ignoring both the pages posted which include MANY international and national bodies and institutions showing clear cut evidence that HUMANS are the main or leading cause to climate change.
There are two general types of arguments. One is positive in which you forward an alternative, provide evidence and add an argument to the discussion.
The other type is negative, meaning you rebut presented evidence by your opposition, thus removing it from the discussion.
You have done neither, and are just assuming you think you know what is right for no logical, evidence based, or expert based reason.
Engage with the science supported by essentially every scientist in the field with your own logical or evidence based argument or go back to /pol/
Still waiting..
Brandon Watson
>Not an argument. FUCK YOU
Carson Howard
>Not an argument.
Not engaging with the literal evidence and simply assuming you're right without looking at the actual evidence or engaging with it in any meaningful way.
