Einstein was a moron and a thief.... Here's why

Einstein was a moron and a thief. He stole patents when he worked for the Swiss patent office. His only 'brilliance' was in his ability to PLAGIARIZE and STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S IDEAS, PASSING THEM OFF AS HIS OWN. Einstein's education, or lack thereof, is an important part of this story. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of Einstein's early education that he "showed little scholastic ability." It also says that at the age of 15, "with poor grades in history, geography, and languages, he left school with no diploma." Einstein himself wrote in a school paper of his "lack of imagination and practical ability." In 1895, Einstein failed a simple entrance exam to an engineering school in Zurich.

This exam consisted mainly of mathematical problems, and Einstein showed himself to be mathematically inept in this exam. He then entered a lesser school hoping to use it as a stepping stone to the engineering school he could not get into, but after graduating in 1900, he still could not get a position at the engineering school!

Unable to go to the school as he had wanted, he got a job (with the help of a friend) at the patent office in Bern. He was to be a technical expert third class, which meant that he was too incompetent for a higher qualified position. Even after publishing his so-called ground-breaking papers of 1905 and after working in the patent office for six years, he was only elevated to a second class standing. Remember, the work he was doing at the patent office, for which he was only rated third class, was not quantum mechanics or theoretical physics, but was reviewing technical documents for patents of every day things; yet he was barely qualified.

He would work at the patent office until 1909, all the while continuously trying to get a position at a university, but without success. All of these facts are true, but now begins the myth.

(cont)

Supposedly, while working a full time job, without the aid of university colleagues, a staff of graduate students, a laboratory, or any of the things normally associated with an academic setting, Einstein in his spare time wrote four ground-breaking essays in the field of theoretical physics and quantum mechanics that were published in 1905.

Many people have recognized the impossibility of such a feat, including Einstein himself, and therefore Einstein has led people to believe that many of these ideas came to him in his sleep, out of the blue, because indeed that is the only logical explanation of how an admittedly inept moron could have written such documents at the age of 26 without any real education.

HOWEVER, THE TRUTH IS: HE STOLE THE IDEAS AND PLAGIARIZED THE PAPERS.

Therefore, we will look at each of these ideas and discover the source of each. It should be remembered that these ideas are presented by Einstein's worshipers as totally new and completely different, each of which would change the landscape of science. These four papers dealt with the following four ideas, respectively:

1) The foundation of the photon theory of light;

2) The equivalence of energy and mass;

3) The explanation of Brownian motion in liquids;

4) The special theory of relativity.

Let us look at the last of these theories, the theory of relativity. This is perhaps the most famous idea falsely attributed to Einstein. Specifically, this 1905 paper dealt with what Einstein called the Special Theory of Relativity (the General Theory would come in 1915).
This theory contradicted the traditional Newtonian mechanics and was based upon two premises:

1) in the absence of acceleration, the laws of nature are the same for all observers; and

(cont)

2) since the speed of light is independent of the motion of its source, then the time interval between two events is longer for an observer in whose frame of reference the events occur at different places than for an observer in whose frame of reference the events occur in the same place. This is basically the idea that time passes more slowly as one's velocity approaches the speed of light, relative to slower velocities where time would pass faster. This theory has been validated by modern experiments and is the basis for modern physics. But these two premises are far from being originally Einstein's. FIRST OF ALL, THE IDEA THAT THE SPEED OF LIGHT WAS A CONSTANT AND WAS INDEPENDENT OF THE MOTION OF ITS SOURCE WAS NOT EINSTEIN'S AT ALL, BUT WAS PROPOSED BY THE SCOTTISH SCIENTIST JAMES MAXWELL in 1878.

Maxwell studied the phenomenon of light extensively and first proposed that it was electromagnetic in nature. James Maxwell wrote an article to this effect for the 1878 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica. His ideas prompted much debate, and by 1887, as a result of his work and the ensuing debate, the scientific community, particularly Lorentz, Michelson, and Morley reached the conclusion that the velocity of light was independent of the velocity of the observer.

Thus, this piece of the Special Theory of Relativity was known 27 years before Einstein wrote his paper. This debate over the nature of light also led Michelson and Morley to conduct an important experiment, the results of which could not be explained by Newtonian mechanics. They observed a phenomenon caused by relativity but they did not understand relativity. They had attempted to detect the motion of the earth through ether, which was a medium thought to be necessary for the propagation of light.

HOLY SHIT

Can you imagine the implications of this were it true.


It would literally not matter at all :o

Lowqualitybait.tpr
Nice try mate don't you have anything more productive to do beside vomiting your lies on a forum full of high schooler,I means seriously who are you trying to impress?
Source or GTFO with your alternatives fact

Assuming any of this is true, how was he too dumb for academic life but smart enough to deceive the entire world, for more than a century, into believing he was a genius?

>FIRST OF ALL, THE IDEA THAT THE SPEED OF LIGHT WAS A CONSTANT AND WAS INDEPENDENT OF THE MOTION OF ITS SOURCE WAS NOT EINSTEIN'S AT ALL, BUT WAS PROPOSED BY THE SCOTTISH SCIENTIST JAMES MAXWELL in 1878.

Do you really think this a massive revelation? Fuck me user, this is basic shit.

These threads pop up a lot on Veeky Forums, but nobody really gives a shit.

People like Einstein, Feyman, Tyson, Hawking and Krauss taught me the most important lesson in the universe. You can be a person of average intelligence and convince people you're leading humanity.

tearing down intellectual giants and anyone smarter than you in general does not by even the smallest iota make you any more intelligent.

Nobody thinks Tyson and Krauss are leading humanity.

Shut the fuck up retard crackpot

Get back to school
Get your diploma
Get a job
Get a wife and kids

Retard

So this is the respect a scientist has for the truth. Anyways, he was not smart enough to invent brilliant theories, so he was not smart enough to identify correct ones. Information is non local and light has nothing to fucking do with causality. If you entertain that notion you are a fool.

> receive patent for special space-time manufacture
> sweet space-time where speed of light is constant
> allows all kind of tricky stuff
> secretly build time-machine using patent ideas while delaying patent acceptation
> TIME MACHINE

rewind, rewind, rewind

> invent general relativity before rightfull inventor
> gets famous
> gets rich
> gets the pussy

t. patent office guy

>respect for truth
Please high school philosophers go away.

World is about politics, economics, family, progress, conflict; truth comes second. Or third. Or fourth.

Remember: he never cited anyone. A sign of plagiarism.

But Tyson is on telly, talking science so he must be the all knowing entity.

All he did was meet Sagan becouse he was black.

>yet he was barely qualified
Most people are in NO WAY QUALIFIED. Not for anything.
So, I guess you complimented him.
Too many people with different versions of people (second hand info) to trust any of you. Most of you never met him: far less spent enough time with him to say whether he was honorable (worthy of all the praise you give him). However, when you do stop idolizing him, then you will see that you have surpassed your master...and now you are the new and improved master. Some will believe they're smarter, but others will "feel" it.

honestly /pol/ why don't you just admit you hate him because he's a jew instead of going to such lengths to pretend you have a real reason

>einstein was a moron and a thief

onlyon4chan.jpg

>he thinks he can succeed in anything without justified information and accuracy

Dont cut urself on thos edges

Oy vey.

H-he was just bad at academics, all geniuses are like that.
H-haha. Take that /pol/tard.

...

>stein
Not entirely convinced he did but wouldn't be surprised if his work was in fact stolen.

...

even if this is true, he is still a genius

>light has nothing to fucking do with causality
>I don't understand what special relativity means: the post

He's a victim of pop-sci. His accomplishments were blown WAY out of proportion by the media.
This famous photo which "illustrates his playfulness and sense of humor" is totally wrong. The media were harassing him for a photograph he stuck his tongue out in disgust at them.

>blown out of proportion

are you joking? he reproved that light was comprised of photons with the photoelectric effect. he showed its speed was constant regardless of reference frame. he showed that gravity warped space and time itself, and proved it using a telescope during an eclipse to map out the coordinates of stars. his formulas predicted black holes and the expansion of the universe.

please tell me, how are any of these accomplishments blown out of proportions?

If you could verify any of those claims with reliable sources, then you'd have a case with /sci. What you have said directly contradictions evidence of what I've seen to the contrary. For example, he received the highest possible grades in physics and mathematics in university but not so much in language and history classes. The report card can be found.

While he was working at the patent office he kept in touch with other physicists and kept working on his physics problems on his own time. He had a Phd in physics and in fact, his dissertation had something to do with brownian motion and calculating avragados number. Had difficulty securing a position at a university as a professor.

Yeah, he might've been a poor student while he was in grade school and highschool but that doesn't mean he couldn't end up being a great physicist. You really think his poor grades (probably due to a complete lethargy in material he didn't care for) in humanities classes in GRADE/HIGH school bears any indication of what one will achieve scholastically in PHYSICS?

Einstein failing at math in school is a meme he mastered calculus at 15

This. You might have had an argument there but missing something so fundamental makes you lose all credibility.

Its wrong...

Ok, but if they aren't above average, how did they convince everyone else that they are gifted?

and still other score a 168 on the sb5

Source??

>He stole patents when he worked for the Swiss patent office.
Source?
Since this is still in your "All of these facts are true" part.

not Veeky Forums related

Don't know if he stole his ideas, but his ideas and theories are either just plain wrong or so basic that a retard well-read in Physics could have deduced it, as long as he wasn't as preoccupied with more important matters, or stuck in some false political mindset: Photoelectric effect.

>He proved that light was comprised of photons

No, that was Planck and Newton who assumed that.

It was De Broglie's Wave Equation which proved it as particles are unique in having momentum.

Photoelectric effect actually proves that light is a wave as it shows that light has a frequency, and it's energy is proportional to that frequency.
If you think about it, there's no reason why the individual EM waves of light couldn't just interact with the electrons 1-to-1.

Let's see you deduce GR then nerd.

>The idea of space-time curvature didn't exist before Einstein

Yeah, nice try. Like I suggested with the PE effect, Einstein wasn't good at imagining these different things, but he could understand quantum physics to a primitive level and so could deduce if certain things were true.

His only contribution to Space-Time is the Einstein Field Equation, which is most likely wrong because of the biggest meme of physics: Dark Energy.

>The Encyclopedia Britannica says of Einstein's early education that he "showed little scholastic ability." It also says that at the age of 15, "with poor grades in history, geography, and languages, he left school with no diploma." Einstein himself wrote in a school paper of his "lack of imagination and practical ability." In 1895, Einstein failed a simple entrance exam to an engineering school in Zurich.
Literally the next line after that on there is this: "Because of his exceptional math scores, he was allowed into the polytechnic on the condition that he first finish his formal schooling. He went to a special high school run by Jost Winteler in Aarau, Switzerland, and graduated in 1896. "

I fucking hate Dark Energy

Wow, they sure are mad...