Turned down living by faith (religions)

Nietzsche was never an aristocrat.

Boy does he sound like he wished he was tho

You can tell it really burned his ass every night.

>seven pounds of fruit
didn't help

>With a Spartan rigour which never ceased to amaze his landlord-grocer, Nietzsche would get up every morning when the faintly dawning sky was still grey, and, after washing himself with cold water from the pitcher and china basin in his bedroom and drinking some warm milk, he would, when not felled by headaches and vomiting, work uninterruptedly until eleven in the morning. He then went for a brisk, two-hour walk through the nearby forest or along the edge of Lake Silvaplana (to the north-east) or of Lake Sils (to the south-west), stopping every now and then to jot down his latest thoughts in the notebook he always carried with him. Returning for a late luncheon at the Hôtel Alpenrose, Nietzsche, who detested promiscuity, avoided the midday crush of the table d’hôte in the large dining-room and ate a more or less ‘private’ lunch, usually consisting of a beefsteak and an ‘unbelievable’ quantity of fruit, which was, the hotel manager was persuaded, the chief cause of his frequent stomach upsets. After luncheon, usually dressed in a long and somewhat threadbare brown jacket, and armed as usual with notebook, pencil, and a large grey-green parasol to shade his eyes, he would stride off again on an even longer walk, which sometimes took him up the Fextal as far as its majestic glacier. Returning ‘home’ between four and five o’clock, he would immediately get back to work, sustaining himself on biscuits, peasant bread, honey (sent from Naumburg), fruit and pots of tea he brewed for himself in the little upstairs ‘dining-room’ next to his bedroom, until, worn out, he snuffed out the candle and went to bed around 11 p.m.

>peasant bread
>peasant
A Dionysian guilty pleasure, I presume

High pasta potential.

stoicism most important idea is to live in accordance with nature

nietzche wasn't even a chad, he was a failed norman cuck.

He is a prime example of why philosophy should be left to the wizards

>turned down living by ego (stoicism)

Now I'm not no philosophy major or nothing, but this don't seem right.

>With a Spartan rigour which never ceased to amaze his slave servant, Socrates would get up every morning when the faintly dawning sky was still grey, and, after washing himself with cold water from the greek vase in his bedroom and drinking some warm wine, he would, when not fellated by young boy pupils, talk uninterruptedly until eleven in the morning. He then went for a brisk, two-hour marathon through the nearby forest or along the edge of Acropolis, stopping every now and then to ask his latest thoughts to random craftsmen he always found around with him. Returning for a late symposium at the local lord's manor, Socrates, who cherised promiscuity, sought the midday crush of the orgy in the large dining-room and ate a more or less ‘private’ lunch, usually consisting of a beefsteak and an ‘unbelievable’ quantity of dicks, which was, Plato persuaded, the chief cause of his frequent stomach upsets. After luncheon, usually dressed in a long and somewhat threadbare toga, and armed as usual with thick, bulgy, and a large musscles to shade his intellect, he would stride off again on an even longer walk, which sometimes took him up the Mount Parnassus as far as its majestic oracle. Returning ‘home’ between four and five o’clock, he would immediately get back to work, sustaining himself on young aristocratic boys, peasant boys, wine (sent from Sicily), fruit and pots of ambrosia he brewed for himself in the little upstairs ‘dining-room’ next to his bedroom, until, worn out, he snuffed out the candle and went to bed around 11 p.m.

someone sum up Nietzsche philosophy for a normie

All that fucking fruit, no wonder he was uncomfortable.

hey! shut the fuck up idiot

I am right and you are wrong.

Congratulations on making the least intelligent post of the day.

>"No calm or peace of mind!"
>end up at Taoism
Also
>"babby"

nice chart bud

Be a nazi psychopath because "the mob" (actual fulfilled people) made you an outcast cause you look like a muhfuggin UHHHHHHH

false he wasnt a nazi ha-ha!

No. We ARE animals. Don't forget it.

Be yourself

>usually consisting of a beefsteak and an ‘unbelievable’ quantity of dicks, which was, Plato persuaded, the chief cause of his frequent stomach upsets

hahahahaha

>told us to to live "in accordance to nature"

This is wrong though. His exact criticism of the stoics regards the futility of living "according to nature."

...

>So, he wants us to be like animals? What an ass.
???? We are animals

>>>turned down living by denial of desire (buddhism)
this is false

scares me how people of lit i thought to be intelectually cultivated people are in fact cringe teens like the rest of Veeky Forums

At last you see the truth. Nihilism is everywhere, even here.

I'm really glad Nietzche is this boards shitposting meme. Its good to know even we can't escape the same tier as Todd and Bane posters.

if nihilism is the truth how can you still be nihilist?

read emerson and reevaluate this

So you want to live 'according to nature?' Oh, you noble Stoics, what a fraud is in this phrase! Imagine something like nature, profligate without measure, indifferent without measure, without purpose and regard, without mercy and justice, fertile and barren and uncertain at the same time, think of indifference itself as power — how could you live according to this indifference? Living — isn't that wanting specifically to be something other than this nature? Isn't living assessing, preferring, being unfair, being limited, wanting to be different? And assuming your imperative to 'live according to nature' basically amounts to 'living according to life' — well how could you not? Why make a principle out of what you yourselves are and must be?

from beyond good and evil

Maddox with a larger vocabulary and more convoluted prose.

>stocism
>ego

>not no

hmm...

underrated post

The existentialist political philosophy part makes no fucking sense. Y'all know that the core tenet of Sartre and existentialism is that life comes with no preordained "to go" meaning, right? "Existence precedes essence." Fucking high school goth kids have an understanding of this shit. Why do you pseuds keep unironically disseminating this retarded chart?

Why can't we have Nietzsche generals, effectively patrician generals.

We would discuss the Hellenes, determinate and interested (contra Kant) aesthetics, French literature, Southern music, hiking trails, Good and Bad, fruit, historicism, becoming, and other related concepts.

Or is it better to OP with sloppy assertions so there will be guaranteed correction posts?

I was gonna post that thx for doing my work for me

Tfw I AM a philosophy major at a good university and in my last year and I still know pretty much nothing. In earnest I'm still pretty much a brute more than an intellectual, who more than anything has come to hate "dialectics", argumentation, discussion, ... . Probably why I always appreciated Nietzsche. I just want to write as freely as him, current academics is a strain on creativity and a bore. Modern focus on copyright and plagiarism, even "self-plagiarism" as if such a thing could exist, is halting philosophical progress and creativity. Most of the great works throughout history could never be written today.

>or any political book of your choice really
>or any political book of your choice really
>or any political book of your choice really

>Most of the great works throughout history could never be written today.
I'm not necessarily disagreeing with your meaning, but do you think that literally inserting any of the great works into those plagiarism search engines would return anything other than

Or do you mean that referencing-rules pedantry forces a disruptive staccato into a thinker's working?

I am always amazed how readable Nietzsche's pre-socratics essay is, considering how young he was, and that he didn't have populist intentions like many writers specialise in today. I consider it the best book on them, yet it wouldn't hold up to current academic standards. In fact, Nietzsche's entire work has this same character.

That sounds v comfy.

You're being too optimistic, tho. Nietzsche generals would, without fail, devolve into "but was he a nihilist????" and similar tired, meme ass bullshit that doesn't actually engage with Nietzsche's most interesting ideas or applications, both lofty/academic and mundane/everyday, of those ideas.

>Nietzsche generals would, without fail, devolve into "but was he a nihilist????" and similar tired, meme ass bullshit that doesn't actually engage with Nietzsche's most interesting ideas or applications
This isn't true. If anything generals in good taste tend to be more elitist on a topic, since there isn't an OP question/premise for the layman to immediately react to beyond maybe 'ad hom'. They develop their own in-jokes and history, and these elements create the exact same effect.

>"[I have] come to hate 'dialectics', argumentation, discussion"

Sounds like the problem's you, not philosophy. You should have majored in lit or something.

I'm in the exact same position as you except I am a freshman.

Do you think I should stick to multi-disciplinary humanities (from what i see it implies i get my own choice of which philosophy and critical apparatus to use, and even which art to focus on), or is it worth enduring the systemizers, analytics and idealists because you get to focus solely on the highest discipline alone?

Yeah, he actually likes Buddhism.

I can't recall exactly what he thought of it, but it was something along the lines of 'respectable nihilism' (in that it can be respected/admired). He definitely felt it was superior to Christianity.

>humanization
Keked and checked. Asians are truly inhuman.

>he actually likes Buddhism.
Don't go that far. Anyway this is what you're looking for, obviously from Antichrist:
>Nietzsche unfavorably compares Christianity to Buddhism. He posits that Christianity is "the struggle against sin", whereas Buddhism is "the struggle against suffering"; to Nietzsche, Christianity limits and lowers humankind by assailing its natural and inevitable instincts as depraved ("sin"), whereas Buddhism advises one merely to eschew suffering. While Christianity is full of "revengefulness" and "antipathy" (e.g., the Last Judgment), Buddhism promotes "benevolence, being kind, as health-promoting." Buddhism is also suggested to be the more "honest" of the two religions, for its being strictly "phenomenalistic", and because "Christianity makes a thousand promises but keeps none." Martyrdom, rather than being a moral high ground or position of strength, is indicative of an "obtuseness to the question of truth."

underrated post.

How could it be from Der Antichrist when it starts with "Nietzsche ..."

The quotes within the summary, you obtuse fucktard.

You could probably go read his wiki real quick and get a better idea than most of Veeky Forums

what do you you think literary criticism is boyo

Dude he got rejected by Salome a bunch of times. It made him super pissy and misogynistic, definitely reminds me more of an autistic than a Chad.

Social life is no longer organised meaningfully and in light of that the individual will need to create his own meaning.

>Unironically quoting from Francis Hackuyama
>Implying anyone is, or has been 'successfully treated' by antidepressants

that fucking feel man

because the amount of true /patricians/ on lit is probably not a large number, and even most of those people would just resort to shitposting anyways as they get enough intellectual stimulus from their real lives.

Call it /Hyperboreans/.