Can anyone here who has seen the great global warming swindle explain to me if its legit or not and how it affects us...

British Columbia has instituted an actual carbon tax which was supposed to be "revenue neutral," but turned out not to be.

Other swindlers have started trading carbon credits which is essentially creating buying power out of nothing.

You are probably fine in a first world country, and the problem may have been blown proportion. However, people are going to die globally, and at the end of the day, not fixing it is going to be more expensive than fixing it.

The science is settled!

Anyone who dies because of global warming is probably a subhuman, anyway.

It's just as bad as the great tobacco swindle.

youtu.be/pRenGy0cg5s?t=4m

>Anyone who dies will be in a third world country.

Well, that solves a lot of our problems, such as overpopulation.

But we still need mo money for dem programs.

The amount of pollution and rate of global warming occurring is affecting the ocean more than anything else. The Great Barrier Reef will be completely dead in a couple of years because of our actions; the reef is about fully dead. Communities which survive off of the ocean will be uprooted, and a large population of environmental refugees will be formed.

>need it for an essay
Is it a liberal loyalty test or are you allowed to think?

You people are so fucking stupid. If the conditions in Africa and other shitholes worsen even more, the shitskins will just migrate to the first world countries and destroy the western culture anyway.

Not if you just don't let them in.

We are a global economy. Bad shit happening in the third world still harms us economically. Plus a good chunk of our food supply is grown in the third world. Prices will go up.

youre allowed to prove your points so yea you can think

Just do your own research. Most of the figures reported by scientists are from independent surveys and yet have very high interrater reliability...
Check out sources like NASA and look at the data. Look up lectures from people capable of interpreting that data and learn how to interpret it yourself.
The only thing I believe in is science. I'm no fan of mass media, but for this movie to accuse the entire international scientific community of collaborating with the media to make it taboo to deny climate change is simply ludicrous.

Also sun spots are much cooler than the sun's average surface temperature. It's solar flares that can affect us, not sun spots. If flares and sun spots were responsible then the data from NASA should reflect the 11-year solar cycle with a roughly sinusoidal pattern- which it doesn't.

It's a big load of horseshit

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle#Reactions_from_scientists

The RSS data set, the favorite of the deniers, was shown to be wrong last year.

youtu.be/LiZlBspV2-M?t=3m55s

So is it legit

>So is it legit

As legit as your interest in facts and knowledge, yes

So it isn't legit

its all a hoex

Why does this dog shit keep getting posted to Veeky Forums. take your pseudo science and 'independent research' elssewhere

Everyone will lose money when they place a carbon tax the entire economy will stifle and destroy the technological progress need to solve global warming.

Its creating scarcity where there isn't and only benefits large corporations

citation needed

it's all ready shit there if the haven't come here yet they won't when it happens and the thing is it'll happen so slowly they won't notice.

>just another scam
...whatever you say, Cletus

>thats all you need to know
...no actual Science, of course.

>It's a big load of horseshit
no U

>Most of the figures reported by scientists are from independent surveys
Nope. They all use essentially the same data set, the Global Historical Climate Network (GHCN)
And they use the same methods;Time of Reading adjustments (downward in the far past), and homogenization over the "corrected" data set.

See the attached. Communication between UCAR (part of the U.S. NOAA) and England Hadley CRU climate researchers.