Overused clichés

>a critique of
>pseudo-
>post-
And especially jargon like that.
>(In academic Humanities): the French borrowing of -ité's and words turned into plurals, like textualities, tenors, rhythms, geographies (when not applied to land forms), pluralities, modernities, sexualities, ...
>verbs like 'mapping', 'traces', all of these offenders stem from the American academic infatuation with structuralism and the clunky translation of it.

And general awkward uses of language.

Lmao this is so autistic...

WHO THE FUCK CARES?

>ceremonial
>space
>speaking truth to power
>ways of knowing

>ways of
That's a massive one.

>ways of being
>hundreds of instances of the word being
>modalities of being
&c.

>beg to differ

>&c.

Internet speak.

This work of art intends to start a conversation about the relationship between memory and perception, reflecting on the language of narrative and how it addresses the author's introductory speculation on the space where examination intersects with exploration.

place and space
signifier and signified
the work and the text
mimesis and diegesis
bodygovernmentality

all shit.

Fuck off you elitist SJW cuck

Yes, I find such trite drivel rather shallow and pedantic.

wow

I hate how a reading of something is a 'lense' now
Cities are 'urban spaces'

>an exploration of
>"Powerful" (incredibly overused, meaningless word)
>"Narrative" (equally useless word)
>clunky

Millenials also really love question marks in informal communication. They'll put it on statements, give you a single ? or blast you with a whole row ????????

bump

Do you mean "lens?"

it's more polite than what it's short for:
"what the fuck are you talking about?"

>Allow me to 'unpack' this a little

>as it were
>the way in which

>dichotomy
>fundamental
>vicissitude
>apposite
>problematic
>xir

What if it's a real dichotomy and not just a bullshit one?

I feel you.