What did de Botton mean by this?

false flag? His arguments about polyamory started out ok but turn into weak sauce about spanking and pirate outfits

Even people obsessed with shitty hobbies like lawnmower spotting consider Infinite Jest and Infinite Jest readers boring.

I really suspect that whatever East Asian country the visual part was outsourced to had a hand in this.

Actually it was more about the black woman not being able to deal with the realities of polyamory as much as the man. The white guy was just fine

this

>>What did de Botton mean by this?
>He means that Polyamory only works when you don't really give a shit about any of your partners

And it's true

Pretty much this senpai.
Polyamory is for hedonists who wish to fulfill their own needs and mask it in this phone sense of "open-minded love."
It's all bullshit.

As a hedonist I assumed "open-minded love" meant fulfilling my own wants, not needs, you don't need love.

For a lot of people it isn't, especially if it's a lone incident after 15 years of marriage or something like that.

When can we have a board dedicated to lawnmowers?
>John Deere is for normies
>Cub Cadet is the overhyped meme brand

>inb4 you have to deal with a child who can only see the world in a dichotomy of cucks and alphas

Where do you think all of those missing teen posters outside of Sam's Club come from?

>He means that Polyamory only works when you don't really give a shit about any of your partners

Thats not really true, ask the mormons.

Imagine if you were a true Alpha Dawg™ and you could provide for 2 hot bodacious intellectual great mummy women, who were great friends; you are telling me you couldnt all live together, have children with both, watch football on sunday while they go shopping for shoes, let them uck each other when you didnt feel like it, etc.?

Takbir, this is a wise man, truly bigamy is the best way forward

That's polygyny and that works.

it works okay if you're too retarded to see the other forces at work.

im in an open relationship
its fine
its fun even
tips dont be a fucking insecure cuck

It sounded like he's burned from a failed polyamorous relationship then falsely concludes nobody can do it. By far the worst video of his I've seen.

>im in an open relationship
>tips don't be a (...) cuck

>literal cucks

>caring about the end of a relationship
You'll grow out of it kid

kek
really tho
its pretty fun

>tells you not to be a cuck while being a cuck
proof that cuckposters are really just projecting.

>these guys have sex with more than one woman
>I have sex with none
>I'll call him a cuck that'll show him

not being able to divorce your emotions makes you a cuck
stay pleb my friend

I'm sorry, but if you're okay with your woman sleeping with other men your brain is literally defective.

Polygyny is another matter, that is just what G-d intended.

Women are incapable of friendship, especially when competing for the attention of a single male.

what?
divorcing yourself from your emotions is literally what makes you able to be a cuck.
lmao cuck.

>these posts

>god
Threatened by my sexual liberation
cant wait to fuck your girlfriends too m8's
its gonna be lit

hahahahahahaha

7/10 bait

You got me this far

shut up you racist western imperialist pigdog

>getting cucked
>sexual liberation
LOL

He's samefagging I'm pretty sure he's being serious lmao.

>Still have an apatite for others while in a relationship
>peruse it
>Get called a cuck
wew lads
Dont lie to me and pretend you dont want to fuck other girls than youre gf
so why submit to that?

I do but i don't want her to. Every guy in an open relationship is a cuck in self-denial congrats on being half a man.

I'm saying that is fine, western devil, but allowing your women to sleep with other men, does in fact mean that your brain is defective and infected by the american homosexual virus.

You're a cuck if you allow her to do the same.

A real man fucks many women but has the women be monogamous to him.

A real sub-human you mean. A real man doesn't disgrace the mother of his children

Why would a mother be disgraced by her fellow wives, infidel?

lmao alrigt then muhammed

Islam is a more manly, noble and suitable religion for Europe than Christianity ever was.

Tfw you subscribe to the nihilistic presupposition that humans are too weak to overcome their primal and animalistic instincts, and should not (or can not) strive for loftier goals of a transcendent and lifelong spiritual connection with someone you ca absolutely trust and love unconditionally.

>Arab men and Islam
>not cucked
pick one abdul

mega nu-male

Then don't get into a relationship to begin with. The minute you assert somebody is your woman then you're a hucking for a cucking

HONOR KILLINGS
O
N
O
R

K
I
L
L
I
N
G
S

>ctrl+f "cuck"
>1 of 17

sage

It is in fact perfectly applicable and appropriate in this context.

I just made the thread to point out he had Infinite Meme

The bonds of marriage make the underclass stronger. We must remove them, like we've removed religion, nation, and race. Soon we will live in a world where no one could have any possible reason to care about one another, and we can all be safely exploited and disposed of as individuals.

It also has the potential to keep men unfit for reproduction from having meltdowns due to being tied up in sexless pseudo-romantic relationships.

Polyamory is a natural step in underclass dehumanization.

LOOK AT YOU

HACK-ER

A PATHETIC CREATURE OF FLESH AND BONE

HOW CAN YOU EVER DEFEAT ME

A PERFECT IMMORTAL MACHINE?

>Veeky Forums is still watching school of life videos

I'll be back in a couple years

See you in the funny pages

I didn't watch this, I don't even know who this is. I just saw "polyamory" and jumped at the opportunity to call people cucks and faggots.

how do you get to be enough of a freak to even consider debating whether polyamory is ok

internet pornography and general emotional detachment, possibly autism

Working mothers pay more tax as well. The weaker the family becomes the stronger the state becomes in its stead.

This is really common in youth culture, get ready for another fucked over generation of kids in the future.

I like fucking sluts
She likes fucking dudes
whats the issue here?
when did living according to nature become a crime

Jesus, get a load of this cuck

kek
why is everyone so easily baited and trgigged over cuck shit
We fuck other people
shit is fun
why so mad

Polyamorists like to justify polyamory by saying it's our "natural state"
So they're implying that because humans are animals, and animals are polyamorous [citation needed], then it's our natural instinct to be polyamorous.
Yet, to be human is to transcend our natural instincts, to make our choices based on our abstract thinking, our ability to make moral choices, instead of succumbing to our primal instincts which by now should be only buried deep down inside the soul of a rational man.
Polyamorists are then calling themselves inhuman, which is whatever to me, because I already see them as subhumans.

What a convenient definition of what it means to be human. Also, how is it immoral or irrational?

some user on Veeky Forums linked to this gem

samkriss.com/2013/11/12/why-does-alain-de-botton-want-us-to-kill-our-young/

>Does Alain de Botton fuck? Of course he doesn’t. What happens is the female of the de Botton species releases her eggs in the water, and the male comes along later and fertilises them

You want to fuck other men/women
your partner wants to fuck other men women
2 options
society tell you to hate your partner and to cuck them based on your feelings
or you can not be enslaved by emotion and enjoy patrician sex and love

holy shit who is this monster kike

>Yet, to be human is to transcend our natural instincts
[citation needed]

>who is this famous philosopher

Do you need recommendations newfriend?

>philosopher

I'm getting more of impression of a self-help con artist

he is literally selling badges to bank on emotionally unstable liberals following the trump election emblazoned with "emotionally intelligent"

If you don't need love, you're probably a low-empathy narcissist.

a narcissistic with a higher oxytocin baseline and reaction level than you knows love more than you do

tell me more about love and ocytocin

>I don't need love, but I know all about it.
Who hurt you, user?

I was sexually abused as a child multiple times and after failed attempts at reconciling it with new age techniques and religion I take a psychiatric/chemical stance on these things because thats how things actually work

>polyamory
>double the number of wife's sons

AHAHAHAHA HE ADMITS HE HAS TO IGNORE HIS EMOTIONS WHILE HIS WOMAN GETS RAILED

Polygyny works, and has in numerous societies across the world. Everyone gets to have their genes propagated in polygyny.

Polyandry doesn't work, and never has. One or more men in such a relationship would be relegated to the role of eternal cuck, and would probably destroy society out of resentment.

That sounds super-healthy and loving, the way you can just go numb whenever the woman you love is getting pounded senseless by other men.

>when did living according to nature become a crime

Right around the time where the first proto-societies were formed, several millennia ago.

Because it literally destroys society:

>In suppressing intrasexual competition and reducing the size of the pool of unmarried men, normative monogamy reduces crime rates, including rape, murder, assault, robbery and fraud, as well as decreasing personal abuses. By assuaging the competition for younger brides, normative monogamy decreases (i) the spousal age gap, (ii) fertility, and (iii) gender inequality. By shifting male efforts from seeking wives to paternal investment, normative monogamy increases savings, child investment and economic productivity. By increasing the relatedness within households, normative monogamy reduces intra-household conflict, leading to lower rates of child neglect, abuse, accidental death and homicide. These predictions are tested using converging lines of evidence from across the human sciences.

rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/royptb/367/1589/657.full.pdf

society also thinks twilight is literature
society is no authority i will look up too
its nice that you enjoy being a normal fag tho

You know, if we lived according to nature, I could just beat you senseless and take your "sluts" for my own.

>I could just beat you senseless
But could you tho?

>They think sex=love
damn i remember when i lost my virginity too

Fite me IRL m8

Seriously I'm a pretty big guy. Taller than average, very broad, heavy, deep scary voice. In the old days these kind of features were made for threats and fights. Why do you think human males are bigger than human females? We evolved this way because we were always fighting for mates.

>I could just beat you senseless and take your "sluts" for my own.
two outsomes:
1
we spar and the victor takes the women
2
we spar and you complain about it not being fair
/whining

not him but i live in Nova Scotia
lets throw down pussy

also you sound like an fedora