What exactly is so controversial about race differences in intelligence?
I'm not talking about this book specifically - it's been criticised by a lot of people, whether justifiably or not.
If IQ tests and other standardised tests are culturally biased, as some people say - is there a single example of a test or academic metric where black people outperform whites (not including basketball)?
Other urls found in this thread:
gov.uk
en.wikipedia.org
www1.udel.edu
commons.wikimedia.org
bloomberg.com
slatestarcodex.com
theamericanconservative.com
humanvarieties.org
twitter.com
>What exactly is so controversial about race
Minorities in Britain would hardly be representative of their original ethnic groups (brain drain etc)
Our society is based on the premise that every group is equal, therefor if one group outperform another, it is guilty of cheating and must pay for this crime.
If it was found that this premise is false, it's our entire society that need to be reformed, you can understand why we prefere not to talk about it.
>it is guilty of cheating
oh like the asians
Guess we can't discuss racial intelligence in America then since everyone immigrated there under special circumstances.
Supplementary Questions:
>How do normies interpret racial differences in intelligence?
>Are they even aware of them?
>Have you ever personally discussed this with a normie?
Except the racial gap is well documented among native inhabitants of Europe and Africa. Even in African countries where whites are the minority (and are treated like second class citizens).
Society is full of retards who will pretend genetic inequality justify their agendas.
Whether or not that produces worst results than ignoring the inequalities is the real question.
