You may have enjoyed my recent post about the Riemann hypothesis. If you did not see it, please have a look and notice how the analytical framework un-paradoxes the Banach--Tarski paradox.
Why am I posting again? To beg for money of course!!! Even if my argument is correct, it is probably not formatted to get the Millennium Prize money, and even if it was my personal ethics prevent me from publishing it the place where it have to go to qualify for the money... and that money is, I think, not actually for solving the problem, but for having a solution in "officially sanctioned literature" for two years without being refuted. I will probably have scabies in two years if nothing changes so that doesn't work for me anyhow. So... Here I am begging for money.
The Banach--Tarski paradox doesn't need "un-paradoxing", we already understand it and it is not a contradiction. it's only a "paradox" because it conflicts with intuition, but it is a seamless and well established result
Colton Jackson
>vixra.org
Hunter Reyes
>I wish to thank my father Joe Tooker for always making me do my algebra homework when I was in eighth grade and for teaching me about computer assisted design software when I was in elementary school. These skills have proven useful to me. As a fellow man of physics and mathematics, his interest in such things is surely the original interest that drives this research in the sense that such things pass to sons from their fathers.
>Only citations are his own vixra papers
Cooper Peterson
Me and many other people disagree with you, and if you were in the majority, they would not have called it a paradox to begin with.
Jace Anderson
Is there a way to explain the banach-tarski paradox in layman's terms without actually framing it as a doubling of volume?
Brandon Perez
You say that as if I am the one in charge of arXiv's decision not to let me put my papers there, which I promise you that I am not
I cite my own papers because these advanced results of my own research are built on the preliminary and intermediate results of that program, which was entirely the brainchild of myself. No one else's research is relevant except for the stuff 100+ years ago that is normally not cited.
Lucas Robinson
>vixra intothetrash.jpeg
Alexander Butler
>they would not have called it a paradox to begin with >what is the twins paradox
