Whats the scariest equation you know?

Whats the scariest equation you know?

[math] \zeta(s)=0 [/math]

2=1

Literally shaking righte now

energy mass equivalence

for normies that don't set c to be unitless:
[math] e=mc^{2} [/math]

(me)^2=s

oh yeah? prove it

>normies
>not put a complete equation
[math]E^2=m^2c^4+(pc)^2[/math]

prove what?

N=NP

for the love of god at least use the full equation

nigger the point is nuclear weapons, momentum ain't got nothing to do with it

e^(iπ)=-1

Airy Function

y=mx+b

Ya blew it

Holy shit what the fuck is that take it out of my mind

Sin x = opp/hyp

for some reason where live its taught as
y =mx + c

weird. where I live it's
y = mx + t

Kek.
[math]y=mx+q[/math] in Italy.

Spherical harmonics, Hankel and Bessel functions were hard for me, at first.

kek

By far.

[math]n!+1=m^{2}[/math]

momentum equations always freak me the fuck out

ay+bx+c=0 where I live, plebs

Navier-Stokes, despite being not a very advanced one, is quite scary

No one uses small e for energy you brainlet

kx + d = y in Austria

What is this?

euler's identity

it has everything in it it. e,i,pi,1,0

you can't just do shit like that homie

>Navier-Stokes, despite being not a very advanced one, is quite scary
I solved Navier-Stokes yesterday while sleeping.
Too bad my dream recall is shit.

y = kx + m in Swediland.

>homie

y = ax + b masterrace reporting in.

Just to clarify, mx+t is Germany

Oh and the t is called Y-Achsenabschnitt in German.

I'm from germany and we learned it with mx+b

Nice pic

this guy took his first compsci course yesterday afternoon!!!! congrats

Not even just the e^i*pi shit, his identity is the basis for all complex exponents ever,

trigger warning

[math]
y - y_{0} = m(x - x_{0})
[/math]

1=1

Is this thread a discussion about what we name the constants in the equation for a line? Are you all 12?

8" per mile squared
used to calculate the unseen drop in the horizon from the observer on a ball with a circumference of 25000 miles
Spherical trigonometry proves flat earth

What is that?

literal degeneracy.

y = x(t) = at+b

congratulations, you're retarded

f (x) = Ax + B in canada

its a meme like the -1/12th thing. Its not real math, just a little game like when your friend proved 1+1=3 with some dumb shit.

strange, it's f = ar + t where I'm from

the -1/12th thing is used in physics though

not saying the sum of all natural numbers is equal to 1/12th but it makes ya think

So is e^pi*i, check out circuits

test

You can see how shit the education in the US is

In Europe, a line is defined as a geodesic in a local parametrization of [math]\mathbb{R}^n[/math]

Fail!

It's because Zeta shows up a lot
But it's not seen as 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ...

Unlike -1/12, e^ipi can actually be proved mathematically rather easily, provided you know about power series and how sine and cosine are actually defined.

No, it's not. It's just a sometimes beneficial way of using sine and cosine
[math]e^{i \cdot x} = \mathrm{cos}(x) + i \cdot \mathrm{sin} (x)[/math]

The [math]\pi[/math] is arbitrary though and comes from choosing it as measurement for angles.

>The π is arbitrary though and comes from choosing it as measurement for angles.
e^ipi is nothing but [math]e^{i \cdot x} = \mathrm{cos}(x) + i \cdot \mathrm{sin} (x)[/math] with x = pi.

Tell me what 2^i is without using euler

Exactly. And only in radians will [math]cos(\pi) = -1[/math] and [math]sin(\pi) = 0[/math], making [math]e^{i \cdot \pi} = -1[/math].
Instead of [math]\pi[/math] you could also use 180 °.

-2 s = the time I took from you reading this

literal savages

y(x) = kx+n in USSR

wtf
y-y1=m(x-x1) here

found the Physics F-student

\Delta S\ge 0.

[math]3^3+4^3+5^3=6^3[/math]

This one is pretty spooky

[eqn]\bigg(\sum\limits_{i=1}^ni\bigg)^2=\sum\limits_{i=1}^ni^3[/eqn]

Funny, it's y = x + k here in Botswana.

Here is another fun one

[eqn] 3^{n+1}+1 \neq 2^{m+2} \qquad \forall n, m\in\mathbb{N} [/eqn]

So in Botswana, every line in the plane has gradient 1

That one i didn't see before, nice.

Price equation, Price commited suicide once he understood it.

That is pretty spooky, but the equation doesn't seem to have a strong empirical foundation. There are too many exceptions

d/dx(e^x)=e^x

>Using partial differentials for a univariate function

X=(C*U)(C*K)

> he can't into parametric

how embarassing

absolutely agree

entropy > 0

Chills

kek

[math] lim_{x \to 0} \frac{ln(-x)}{i \pi} = i \infty [/math]

0 must equal 100%

I understood that joke

Anybody who has taken a 10th grade calculus course understands that joke.

Nice quads.

>x(t)
What is the point of this?

2spoop

>In the theory of evolution and natural selection, the Price equation (also known as Price's equation or Price's theorem) describes how a trait or gene changes in frequency over time. The equation uses a covariance between a trait and fitness to give a mathematical description of evolution and natural selection. It provides a way to understand the effects that gene transmission and natural selection have on the proportion of genes within each new generation of a population.
Why is it spooky?

WHAT THE FUCK

just thinking about the Lagrangian density (not the t-shirt meme expanded formula) fills me with remorse of all those wasted years studying physics...the mass-energy and the energy-momentum Einstein equations feel like high school math in comparison

Define [eqn] \text{S}_k = \sum_{i=1}^n i^k [/eqn]
If we're given [math] \text{S}_1 = n(n+1)/2 [/math]
[eqn] \implies \text{S}_1^2 = \text{S}_2 + 2 \sum_{\substack{i=2,n \\ j

...

Corrected version. Yes, it's real.
[eqn] \sum_{A_ \ k}^n \ \ \ \sum_{A_{ \ k-1}}^{A_{ \ k}} \ \ \ \sum_{A_{ \ k-2}}^{A_{ \ k-1}} \ \ \ \sum_{A_{ \ k-3}}^{A_{ \ k-2}} \cdots \sum_{A_{\ 1}}^{A_{\ 2}} A_1 = \frac{n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)\cdots(n+k)}{1\cdot2\cdot3\cdot4\cdots k(k+1)}[/eqn]

here it's y=mx+q

All sums begin at 1

The only true minimalist function.
A simple yet elegant little equation.
Makes me tear up a bit

[eqn] 10^3 + 9^3 = 12^3 + 1^3 = 1729 [/eqn]