I feel like I'm missing something

I feel like I'm missing something

Oh nevermind a hexagon with all sides equal has angles equal to 120 so i have 30-60-90 triangle etc

>literally 10th grade trig

Are you American?

It's not solvable without more information, I expect you're supposed to assume that's a regular hexagon but it's not stated.

you can find an answer in terms of PQ or QS

>I expect you're supposed to assume that's a regular hexagon but it's not stated.
>All sides shown to be equal

What did he mean by this? Or is this another case of american education?

>you can find an answer in terms of PQ or QS
>PQ can be shown to equal 50 so a numeric answer is possible

What did he mean by this? Or is this another case of american education?

If i was doing it, id assume the hexagon has side length 1

>id assume the hexagon has side length 1
>clearly stated that the side length is 50

What did he mean by this? Or is this another case of american education?

All angles aren't shown to be equal

>a hexagon with all equal sides but not all equal interior angles can exist

What did he mean by this? Or is this another case of american education?

Kys

>kys is an argument

What did he mean by this? Or is this another case of american education?

>american education?

What did he mean by this? Or is this another case of american education?

You're assuming that all the interior angles are less than 180 degrees.

i learned this in middle School

>an author would represent a concave hexagon like that
>high school even covering concave polygons at all
>being so autistic that if it doesn't explicitly mention that the polygon is convex then you can assume it isn't in a geometry class where convensions are usually the first things that are stated

What did he mean by this? Or is this another case of american education?

A convex hexagon with equal sides doesn't necessarily have equal interior angles.

Is everyone here retarded?
It is shown
>All sides of the hexagon are of equal length
>PR is a 90° angle, and the line Q spanning to its opposite vertice is perpendicular to PS, which also spans from vertice to vertice.

All lengths are equal and all major angles inner of the hexagon are 120°

@OP, I'm perplexed about this "50" but I'll assume its length. Just use pythagoras and some trig and you should be good.

All that shows is that it's symmetric, not that the angles are 120°

Good observation, but still, we could conceivably move R to the right which would decrease length PS and make the angles unequal, while preserving all the properties.

something like this, I imagine

Theyre the same

Show me the construction or you are fake news.

Consider the case where QR=50, PS=0. Then the hexagon has interior angles of 0,180,180,0,180,180.

This should make it more obvious the outer line segments all have the same length.

I'm calling CNN. You are fake news.

All sides of the hexagon (and its clearly a hexagon) are equal. So PS couldn't be 0.

If it was, it wouldn't be a hexagon

This is me
Just realised im wrong. Good diagram

QR = 25.
PS =50sqrt(3)

Answers pulled from my ass. Feels free to correct it.