>Jurisprudence is not a science By definition it is a science of law >Philosophy is not a science Read W. V. O. Quine
Henry Campbell
>knowing this much about every field I'm on the fence between saying it's impressive you're so knowledgeable, to saying you wasted a ton of time and don't know anything. Like jurisprudence. What the fuck is that? Did you google "list of science subjects," find jurisprudence, and then spend hours reading about all the scientist in that field?
Jonathan Taylor
Science isn't chess. You can't just say one person trumps all others.
>Chemistry: Fritz Haber (mainly due to his invention of artificial ammonia synthesis, arguably the most important chemical discovery in the history of the world)
>Philosophy: Friedrich Nietzsche
Daniel Brown
>>newton Yes!! Yes!!!
Xavier Russell
This is bait
Christian Peterson
>alan turning >noam fuckwitsky
Lol how blue pilled can you get?
Cameron James
Mathematics: i'd say Neumann Physics: Newton Chemistry: Mendeleev Logic: Kurt Gödel Astronomy: Newton Again Biology: Charles Darwin, only because he screwed over the first word of the chruch Philosophy: Nietzsche
Austin Foster
Mathematics: Niels Henrik Abel
Bentley Baker
>Psychology >Not Freud >inb4 Psychoanalysis is pseudoscience Today it is irrelevant, but back in the day it was fundamental.
Camden Gomez
>Nietzsche lmao
at best he was good at shitting on other peoples philosophy, none of his own ideas are anything worthwhile. but I guess he's popular with edgy repressed teens with an inflated idea of their self worth.
Noah Wilson
Computer Science: Steve Jobs
Cameron Gonzalez
>Steve Jobs >Not RMS kys
Sincerely, /g/
Zachary Davis
>worshipping a toe-fungus-eating, marxist walrus ishygddt
William James
what important results did rms come up with? literally worthless.
Hunter Scott
>best there's probably hundreds of scientists that live today that are better than those
they just lived in times when things were being discovered
Luis Morris
yeah I bet you would have discovered all that if you were there smarty pants
Connor Williams
>anything worthwhile Literally the XX century has been influenced by all his ideas you ignorant cunt.
>le popular among x Nice argument. Still everything post-Nietzsche is pseudoscientific psychology-based axioms babble anyway.
Keep deluding yourself pseud.
Nicholas Perez
>tfw no Nikola Tesla
Ethan Robinson
meme engineer
Cameron Allen
me?no
somebody? yes
Jose Howard
>Science & MATH Though I agree that below sociology (inclusive) has no place here; Logic, Statistics and CompSci all have very very firm mathematical groundings and all require mathematical reasoning and theory to develop them and thus are welcome on the science and MATH board
Hunter Reed
Mathematics: Euler
Asher Butler
>Physics: Albert Einstein >Biology: Charles Darwin >Linguistics: Noam Chomsky >Economics: John Keynes >Psychology: Burrhus Skinner >Philosophy: Immanuel Kant
Angel Gutierrez
You literally just picked the most memed scientists within each field... Well done OP, you dun' goof'd
Jose Jackson
I remember being thirteen
Brody Young
>Discover something first >hurry best scientist ever
Pro tip. The average scientist today contributes more overall then aNY of these granpas.
He'll Turing cotributes nothing other than a concept in a paper. Claiming he invented computers is like saying Da Vinci invented airplanes.
Adrian Thomas
none of these people are scientists though bro.
They are all THEORETICAL Scientists.
there is a big difference
you need to able to test observe and repeat your theories
example ; can you show me a practical example of a body of water conforming to the exterior of a shape?
Connor Miller
bow to your gods.....
these men you have never met
who wrote books you have never read
and all the while you have faith in their lies
sounds like you just joined a religion bro
Alexander Butler
The time of discovering is essential. With the knowledge people had at that time, then there is a great likelihood the others wouldn't have reached the same conclusion with the same evidence, until years later. If Mendel for instance didn't discover dominant and recessive genes, then someone else probably would have - but it could be decades later. If one could rewrite the history and make a large number of these scientist die as children - there is a good chance we would be decades behind in our scientific understanding of the world.
Gabriel Hughes
How is von Neumann a meme? I don't think he is, but other math threads called him a meme
Ethan Morris
>Carl Gauss Stop memeing his name he is called "Gauß".
Jeremiah Ortiz
The earth's oceans.
Brandon Peterson
>They are all THEORETICAL Scientists. aka. the only scientists who ever did something remotely useful.
"Applications" are a meme, every idiot (also known as engineers) can do that.
Tyler Rogers
Physics: Newton Life: Richard Feynman
Jason Nelson
his early work in ai research with sussman is still extremely relevant after decades.
Juan Cruz
this guy
Matthew White
classical (symbolic) ai is irrelevant
Jackson Powell
>Entire thread >No mention of Maxwell or Boltzmann
Up your game
Jason Johnson
Newton should be mathematics and physics
Xavier Reed
>Logic >very very firm mathematical groundings triggered.
Gavin Adams
Psychology is empirical science you dumbass
Landon Taylor
explain the replication crisis then
Zachary Rodriguez
Maths: Mochizuki
Physics: The Bogdanoffs
Philosophy: Sam Harris
Astronomy: Neil DeGrasse
Magic: Grothendieck
Psychology: Elliot Rodger
Philosophy of Science: Richard Dawkins
Chemistry: Ted Kaczynski
Economics: Ben Bernanke
Political Science: Sdefan Molymew
Anthropology: Varg Vikernes
Computer Science: Bill Gates
Biology: Ken Ham
Landon Walker
Galois
Nicholas Powell
witen. just...
Luke Johnson
>keynes how is that broken window working for you m8?
>einstein a fucking plagiarist
Lincoln Cook
Memeology: richard dawkins
Charles Jones
>Economics: John Keynes Funny way of spelling Ludwig Von Mises
Jeremiah Gonzalez
Are you the faggot Mathematician from the previous thread?
Hunter Watson
>Nietzsche Hahahaha! Mongoloid tier sophistry.
Xavier Richardson
Geology: James Hutton
Asher Perry
>having an iota of respect for any economist ever So far, every economic theory has turned out to be just a flawed ideology. The point of science is to make models that predict reality, not to justify your personal utopias.
Lincoln Parker
Physics[edit] Figure Index score Isaac Newton 100 Albert Einstein 100 Ernest Rutherford 88 Michael Faraday 86 Galileo Galilei 83 Henry Cavendish 57 Niels Bohr 52 J. J. Thomson 50 James Clerk Maxwell 50 Pierre Curie 47 Gustav Kirchhoff 43 Enrico Fermi 42 Werner Heisenberg 41 Marie Curie 41 Paul Dirac 40 James Prescott Joule 40 Christiaan Huygens 39 William Gilbert 37 Thomas Young 37 Robert Hooke 36
Mathematics[edit] Figure Index score Leonhard Euler 100 Isaac Newton 89 Euclid 83 Carl Friedrich Gauss 81 Pierre de Fermat 72 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 72 René Descartes 54 Georg Cantor 50 Blaise Pascal 47 Bernhard Riemann 47 David Hilbert 40 Jakob Bernoulli 40 Diophantus 39 Gerolamo Cardano 37 François Viète 36 Adrien-Marie Legendre 36 John Wallis 36 Augustin-Louis Cauchy 35 Fibonacci 34 Archimedes 33
Can't speak for the others but linguistics is definitely science. You probably don't have a clue what it is though. You probably think it's about translating and interpreting, or documenting and classifying obscure languages.
Aaron Cox
I don't know what I'm doing how do I fix this chart and add more subfields
Michael Davis
Phi of Science: Kuhn
Daniel Davis
his model for scientific revolutions doesn't match up with what actually happens at all
Parker Phillips
Computer Science ... Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson. Bill Joy, too.
Computer Engineering ... Lynn Conway and Carver Mead.
