So this is the power of math...

So this is the power of math. Using mathematical formulas increases the chance to get the right door but in reality nothing changes. What incredible power this subject has.

> nothing changes

The probability distribution changes when you receive additional information.

yes, and the sum of all natural numbers is -0.999.../12

[math]1+2+3+4+...=\dfrac{e^{\pi i}}{11.999...}[/math]

simulate it with a computer you fucktard.

You will see that the mathematics is right and accurately describes reality.

...

Wouldn't that only make sense if door 1 and 2 were opened at the same time

1.) player selected #3
2.) monty opened #1

Helene is so proud that this problem credits a woman's logical ability. She probably uses the result to motivate her betrayal of everyone she collaborates with.

Consider this new problem which disproves Monty Hall:

There are two doors. One has a car, the other has a goat. Monty asks you to pick one of the two doors. There's no trick here, the chance of a car is currently 50/50, easy.

Before the doors are opened, Monty opens a third door which was hidden, revealing a goat. He then asks if you'd like to switch doors.

By statsfag logic, your chances of winning if you switch are 2/3rds, but that doesn't make sense and simulations don't support it, even though this problem is identical to the classical Monty Hall problem since in that, Monty always opens a goat door anyways.

(You)

The solution to this problem is so easy to understand that I must assume that anyone on Veeky Forums saying they don't believe in it must be only pretending to be retarded.

>problem is identical
wrong

>t. undergrad

Oh not the stupid goat shit again

bait asf. but if it's not, don't worry. even paul erdos thought it was wrong. then later when the computer simulation was shown to him, he agreed.

Consider the following:
1000 doors, 999 goats, 1 car
You pick a door, 998 other doors open revealing goats, which leaves only two doors closed, one of them being your choice. Since there's only a probability of 1/1000 that you picked the car from the beginning you switch to the other door.

>In one scenario, you have 1/3 chance of picking car on initial pick

>In another scenario, you have 1/2 chance of picking car on initial pick

>>>>>>>>>even though this problem is identical to the classical Monty Hall problem

bait plz

This fucking thread again

just post it on /v/ or something

>computer simulations represent reality
Yeah a computer working with the exact probability programmed in works the same as a true random chance in reality. You guys are fucking idiots.

its getting fucking annoying
if brainlets cant understand this problem they need to fuck themselves and fuck off

The simitations are wrong. Sticking with a door is the same as choosing that door with a 1/2 chance.

This