When we say a species evolved, we are saying it had a mutation which helped it survive in their environment. So yes, its actually a mistake in the formation of the DNA that turned out to be useful for the species.
Mason Richardson
Random mutations. Non random selection.
That's all it is.
Carter Lewis
It's not a mistake, the term mistake conveys intent. There is no intent in the process of evolution.
Evan Thompson
Why aren't people talking about epigenetics more? Isn't the whole random mutations thing being moved away from? Environment plays a much more proactive role.
Mason Flores
No.
Ryan Reyes
Try any stochastic simulation with an accept/reject algorithm, and you'll see that random events with selection can converge to a useful result.
Alexander Cook
For further reading, google epigenetics pz myers pharyngula
Ayden Carter
In summary: Most epigenetic changes are explicitly reset in plants and animals during sexual reproduction. The few remaining epigenetic changes that survive past that rarely survive more than a few generations. For almost all intents and purposes, there is no stable inheritable epigenetics over many generations, which is precisely what is required for natural selection to start kicking in.
There are exceptions, but they're rare.
PS: Epigenetics isn't new. It's just evo devo. It's not like it was just discovered 5 years ago or something. Again, read some of those PZ Myers blog posts. He's an expert in evo devo, and he knows what he's talking about, and he's a good teacher and good writer.