Let n be an integer

Let n be an integer.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_and_discrete_variables
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

sure, n is always an integer
if you said let n be something else then we'd have trouble

OK,done it


What now?

>relies on something as vague as axiom of choice
kek

because n is for integer

Let i be a nigger

N IS FOR NATURALS YOU FUCKING BRAINLETS REEEEEEEEEEE

lmao
n = -3
m = 23.2 + e^i
get rekt

z = 7/5
r = 1 - i
p = 4

I use n for continuous variables

>p = 4
I used p for something that wasn't a prime in a test once and my professor told me to stop asap lmao

letters have meaning

>continuous variables
it's okay user you won't contribute anything of worth anyways so no one will really mind

People use n for a natural number or unit normal vector, among other things.

Variable assignment doesn't use the Axiom of Choice.

We often use p for a polynomial.

stop being an autist. the first was clearly in the context of numbers, the second a joke, and the third one again in the context of numbers.

even in A[x] one will often note arbitrary elements by f, g and reserve p for irreducibles / primes when doing anything serious

What's k for?

kilo you brainlet

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_and_discrete_variables
Back to high school for you

>if someone says something bad about me that means they don't understand the basic things I'm talking about
this attitude will get you nowhere honestly

>stop being an autist

Look who's talking.

>A[x]
>anything serious

Hows intro to algebra going?

Let [math]n \in \mathbb{C}[/math] be an integer.

They told me I could be anything I wanted to be, so I became an integer.

Let x be a number.

n = nigger
amidoinitrite

>Polynomial Rings
>Not involved in serious work

How is being a brainlet who can't into algebraic geometry going?

Nice quads but mentioning polynomial rings and irreducibles like this is a little embarrassing. Yeah algebraic geometry is important, but you are like a little babby, trying to impress me with your knowledge of arithmetic.

nice quads buddy

>brainlet BTFO by user with good taste in math
>bonus quads
checked

>posts a high-school level wikipedia article backing up his high-school level understanding of mathematics
>tells me to go back to high-school
you trying to start a fight?

>[math]\mathbb{Z} \subseteq \mathbb{C}[/math]
oh boy i'm fucking triggered

WTF you can greentext latex? i did not know this

if it's not true then why is it so common to represent an arbitrary complex number by "z"?

fuck off
that notation is understood to mean canonical inclusion by literally anyone
even children understand that the integer 1 and the complex 1 are "the same"

>let nigger be i
better

yeah i know faggot but it still triggers me

I use dot products, cross products, [math]\times[/math], multiplication dot and decimals all interchangeably, possibly even in the same expression

>assume g = 10m/s

>"the same"
you can't even bring yourself to take the quotes off

>not denoting all of them and function application by writing them one after the other in the same expression
[math]fgxvw[/math]
>what do you mean it's not clear? they're all algebra actions you faggot, they commute. brainlet.

they're obviously not literally the same, as I said before, canonical inclusion. I always call isomorphism "the same" with quotes

>he doesnt study anabelian geometry

Decimals are haram.

i have no option but to use them in my nuclear physics course

k is the "sample" number of the frequency domain when you convert a discrete time function f[n] with a discrete time fourier transform

>in ODE class
>write all my differentials as [math]\partial[/math]

i am unstoppable

>tfw writing + D instead of + C

>assign every variable [math]\xi_i[/math]

Kys.
I don't follow your meaning. Consider the following: You roll a k-sided die n times. What is the probability that each of the k faces appeared at least once? why'd the author elect k?

>tfw changing [math]e^C[/math] into [math]C[/math] without further comment

let [math]f(x)[/math] be a function

Alex is a stupid INTEGER

Let OP be a faggot.

P=NP
P/P=N
1=N

Let n stand for all niggers

let x be a constant

That's because I am too busy studying Anabel's pussy instead.

Rudin uses p and q for rationals iirc.

just gave my an ODE flashback, good times

>Let x be a real number

Let n be a nigger.

What is sqrt(n)

It's m/s^2

ur mom

let ur mom be of schwarzschild radius -1/12m

>let n be an engineer.

Let u and v be vectors...

>Solve for x

>engineers

kek

is w the most neglected letter in math?

there's nothing wrong with this, if [math]e^c[/math] where c is an arbitrary constant, then it's an arbitrary constant [math]C[/math]

It's the second complex variable, after z.

o is up there

>w
just before x, what a shame. Always in it's shadow

There is nothing wrong with this though

This and non-script l

no it's not faggots
if [math]C \in \mathbb{R}[/math] is arbitrary, then it cannot be [math]e^{C}[/math] since [math]\forall x \in \mathbb{R} e^x > 0[/math]

>he doesn't know about the fixed point of the exponential function

Use it all the time in stats and ML

i had a chuckle at this

but most of the time people do what that guy does, C>0

nevermind I am retarded, deleting these quads

>"for all epsilon < 0"...

please explain

>assume [math]\pi=3[/math]

>differentially small

I'll buy that for a dollar.

>using [math]x^2 \sin y dx dy dz[/math] for your differential element of volume instean of [math] r^2 \sin\theta dr d\theta d\phi [/math]

...

>Cylindrical coordinates

>coordinates