Is nature inherently evil?

assassin bugs feeding is some fucked up shit. just sucking the innards of another living creature while its alive.

>People are the only ones evil for willingly causing harm to nature.

Sometimes nature causes harm

Think about the fucking q for 5 seconds before answering retard

You're gonna have to define evil first, my man

Subjective.

>evil is whatever causes unprovoked harm to another living being
What do you think of my definition?

You're gonna have to define define first, my man

I'll define both of those if you define my man, monkey boy.

"evil" is nothing but a construct of human morality resulting from what we experience as free will

free will is a consequence of consciousness
therefore everything without consciousness cant be evil

99.999999999999% of 'nature' doesnt even know what evil means

>tl;dr: fuck off

I can consider it evil from my conscious point of view
why does it bother you so much, though?

How do you know that only humans have consciousness?

seems like we do need a definition of what 'evil' actually means :^)

>only humans have consciousness
where have I mentioned that in my post? do you even read?

you guys are fucking idiots, im outta here

what is a living being? what is the border between living and non living being? Is a video game character a living being? If not, would it be if it's very smart? Or does it have to be made out of organic matter? If so, would a video game character with all of its limitations of nowadays, but made out of organic matter be considered a living being?
Is virus a living being?

Nature is inherently opportunistic.
/thread

First you need to be able to choose to do harm and it not being in your instinct to do harm (aka, feed on your natural prey)

Nothing is inherently evil, "evil" is concept that exists within an ethical system. So going by a given ethical system, one could consider it as such.

...

Is he drowning that rabbit ?

"Being evil" is a human concept. Nature is amoral, it's just what it is.

Drowned it to eat it.

Blame the survival instinct.

This. To do evil it is necessary that you could have done otherwise. Nature doesn't think or choose between options, it just keeps doing whatever it did previously that worked.

Am i soft?
I fell sad when animals gets killed or hurt.
It's completely against my rationality, i dont care about humans.

Dont fell a thing on rekt threads.

>Picture not related

No. And evil is a complex topic in philosophy.

Do you not wash your food before eating it?

I consider evil to be otherwise avoidable, needless, immoral acts.

So torturing something is evil. By that definition dolphins and cats are evil but we already know that.

Relevant Jordan Peterson lecture: youtube.com/watch?v=gwUJHNPMUyU

I don't know if this is the lecture where he talks about the difference between actual, malevolent evil and that of tragedy, but that's a key concept to get before you even begin to head into talking about good and evil.

fuck I messed up here's the right one:
youtube.com/watch?v=MLp7vWB0TeY

>tfw there was no suffering before man sinned
>tfw people choose to believe in a shitty world before burning in eternal suffering
LOL

Define nature and evil user

Best album by them imo

not evil, just wicked

Nature is Satan's church.

It's indifferent to anyone's subjective experience.

There is no physical seperation between the life of one organism and the next

only if someone designed it on purpouse but had the choice not to

otherwise its cruel and brutal, but not evil

or carnivores are simply evil by nature