Are there any renowned scientists speaking out against this new wave of gender bullshit? Or have they all taken the L

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority

>grouping people who don't think Magical Pixie Sprite is a gender with young Earthers

This is what everyone should be afraid of here.

>.m.

>Longitudinal studies of adolescents suggest that sexual orientation may be fluid over the life course for some people, with one study estimating that as many as 80% of male adolescents who report same-sex attractions no longer do as adults
um wow bigoted much like okay it's just who they are it's not a choice okay stop being racist

>He denies science
>doesn't want to be grouped with other people who also deny science

This really makes me think

"gender is a continuum"

only a faggot would think like that, I'm not 80% attracted to females and 20% attracted to males, I'm 100% attracted to females. Am I a statistical freak or this "continuum" is more like 95% of people just like me and 5% making the rest of the "continuum". Fuck, they invented this retarded "continuum" just to justify 5% of people who are freaks.

>I'm not 80% attracted to females and 20% attracted to males, I'm 100% attracted to females

That just means that you are at the middle of the male spectrum. You have to realize that in the continuum of gender, you occupy just a single point. Just because you cannot see the entire spectrum doesn't mean the rest of it doesn't exist. I mean, you know that women exist too, and heterosexual women lie pretty close at the middle of the female spectrum.

So if two points exist then there must be some space filling the gap between them. And men/women aren't even the endpoints of the gender continuum so you are as much of a freak as everyone else. Scientifically, the people at one edge are masculine homosexuals, so masculine that they love the male form. And the other edge is the feminine lesbian, naturally.

Why do you only recognize the woman point and your own? Because your sexuality makes you interact only with women. Your sexuality means you don't like homosexuals, nor pansexuals, nor demiqueers. Which means that you do not look for them. But just because you don't see them doesn't mean they don't exist. This is basic stuff.

To that I am going to add that even though you have been socialized to think that you are attracted 100% of females, there are actually more points in the continuum than there are human beings which means, by the pigeon hole principle, that no more than one person can occupy a point in the continuum. And you think you are really the only one who likes women 100%? topkek.

You are probably at a 98/2 split approximately.

>gender studies
>science

I have no problem with this gender shit. I think they should be allowed to come up with this shit. I should also be allowed to call them retarded.

>yet another bill nye thread
Are /pol/tards too stupid to use the search function?

Do me a favor and watch the Ice Cream and Song Bill Nye vids and tell me the science behind it.

Find any reputable papers that can define genderqueer or demisexual or any of that shit.

>mfw the Bible was clear on the matter nearly 4,000 years ago and secularists still plug their ears in "2017 #lmao"

>I should also be allowed to call them retarded.

But that is rude, and the core concept of a society is that we are all able to, on some level, respect each other and show a level of common decency to one another.

They are not hurting you by expressing their identity, so why would you hurt them?

that's not what the pigeonhole principle is you fucking brainlet.

I owe you no favors. If you post me those videos here I may take a look and answer if I feel like it.

As for the reputable papers, I am also not your secretary. You can google this on your own. There are many sources available and given that you are so adamant at sucking Bill Nye's cock you should contact the show staff and ask for the sources they used for the show.

What if I'm 90% attracted to females and 10% attracted to males?

still 100% a faggot

...

But this is barely even science. nearly everything about the current "gender revoloution" is grounded in philosophy, not science.

Liking women is 90% gay?
What if electrocution gets me off?

>philosophy
that is being far too charitable

>appears in a science show
>claims it isn't science
>isn't already preparing to file a lawsuit or something to put his money where his mouth is

This really makes me think.

Play Devil's Advocate, I can't sue Trump.

Who mentioned Trump?

Bill Nye is a millionaire
Netflix is a billionaire
Every single member of the main cast is a millionaire

If you can prove that they all willfully put in misinformation in a show marked (BY NETFLIX) as educational and scientific then you can get like 3 quadrillion dollars.

But you aren't doing that, because you know that the gender continuum is solid science so all you can do is shitpost about it on Veeky Forums because it hurts your fee fees.

Sex and Gender are separate things

Teaching Kids they're transgendered is potentially harmful, simple as that.

now go watch some BJ porn

>science comes to the conclusion that people who think they're spiritually/emotionally something they arent are 100% correct and should be respected

Nothing wrong with them being aware of it. I'm not going to give them any surgery or anything.

That is not an argument from authority.

Less than 1% of people are actually transgendered, the only reason kids will think they're trans at a young age is if it's taught to them, they should be discovering it on their own once they're older

>Who mentioned Trump?
I mentioned Trump?
There are more reasons as to why I can't sue them. Rather, why it would not be worth the effort. One, I am not an American citizen, so flying all the way to Wherever, XY will cost me money and time. Two, I know without a doubt that taking on this kind of lawsuit will inadvertently put me in the spotlight, and the general consensus these days is that, left or right, feelings trump facts. I will most likely receive everything from mindless death threats to a lack of privacy in my daily life; it isn't worth the social suicide to sue someone for something I can care less about and have come to terms with. Three, I don't own a suit. Four, I'm a nobody, and I would rather it be kept that way until I decide to be a somebody. Five, I don't disagree fully with everything said during that one episode, but I don't fully agree either; there's not a lot I could genuinely make a case for that would, beyond reasonable doubt, stand on its own. Six, with all of that money behind them, I'm sure they could hire the best representatives that could ultimately weasel their way out of the lawsuit with little to no harm, amplified by the ass-pat segment of society that will have their back no matter what. Seven, my first reply was Trump and a question mark, so the only shitposting I've done in this thread is bring politics to Veeky Forums, which does regularly. Eight, my interest in challenging anything said in this thread waned because I realized I could turn off the computer, think what I think, and live my life without any real consequence in the comfort of my own home, and nobody would be the wiser, and it wouldn't even detriment me to think so. Nine, a large majority of people are stupid by the by, so it doesn't matter which kind of dogma or agenda is pushed, people from all kinds of sides will eat it up.

Correlation does not imply causation; Trump doesn't agree with climate change- is it wrong? Sue?

transexualism isn't sexual orientation, fuck off retard

I don't have a problem with my kid thinking they're trans tho. I will forbid surgery like I said. Let them dress and "act" like the other gender, don't matter to me.

topkek a whole paragraph of backpedalling. Love it.

> Trump doesn't agree with climate change- is it wrong? Sue?

But Trump has not made an educational propaganda piece about why climate change is a hoax. If he did this then you know everyone would go crazy on it and some of the most notable political organizations against climate change would launch a lawsuit to at least take it off the air.

If the spectrum of gender was a hoax then you could easily pull this off. Well, maybe you don't want to, but the collective of /pol/ does want to but they haven't even considered doing. That is because they are a bunch of faggots who know that the continuum is gender is a real thing but they are already too deep into their rightwing cuckoldry to concede even a single point to the left.

So now, in /pol/'s retarded brain, if something is supported by liberals, even if it is a literal fact of science like climate change and the gender continuum, then they have to oppose it no matter what.