Sci v Engr

"b-but engamaneers arnt autistic enough"
"they arent mustard raiss"
"le brainlets meme"
"they dun do school as much!!!!1!"

Would you consider someone with a bachelors in science a scientist?
Because I wouldn't consider someone with a bachelors in engineering an engineer

PhD is required for any true patrician status

The difference: physicists learn physics then do tedious research in academia or 9/10 times get thrown to the wolves in industry

Engineers learn physics and use said research to push the limits of human technological capability. If the academia lottery doesn't work out, they supersede their industrial-physicist counterpart

What's your fucking excuse autists?

Engineers fail to learn physics and then try to argue jet fuel can't melt steel beams and CO2 isn't a greenhouse gas.

Engineers are just jealous they can live off government grants that incentivize the creation of an alarmist hypothesis that can't be fully debunked until after they're dead or at least spent all the money. They are instead stuck dealing with the real world and its consequences.

While physicists fail to learn engineering then try to complain they deserve more than poverty wages

TOP
KEK

I kind of get it when mathematicians say that engineers and physicists are just human calculators who don't do true math. But I never get it when a physicist says the same about engineers and physics.

bump cause buried in Shill Nye memes

Seriously, I get how physics (PhD) would be superior when compared to a bachelor's of engineering, but I've heard physics professors themselves say the lines are blurred at PhD level engineering, and that the latter may be the healthier choice for someone who enjoys their wellbeing

You get to learn physics and do research while getting paid significantly more to utilize science while still having the opportunity to publish theories in physics journals if you stumble upon something

Whereas a physicist does the same shit sans design and paycheck, but with more emphasis on theory-proofreading
What's the benefit?

sage addendum: the real advantage physics has here is the purely esoteric theortical (which is based) but it's hard to secure grants for intangible shit and particle physics stuff requires you to be a cog in a machine of hundreds to thousands of people rather than allowing you to do in dependant research like say condensed matter would

But so far as condensed matter is concerned compared to say nanofabrication the above argument applies

>its a other STEM majors get jelly engineers make bank thread

Veeky Forums BTFO

>Jet fuel can't melt steel beams

It can't, but it can severely weaken it and make it collapse

By the way, who the fuck do you think even did all the post 9/11 studies of what happened? Structural engineers