Climate change in about 20 years

climate and weather
there is a difference

>5/10 for making me respond to your troll post

There is a difference between climate and weather

That's why CO2 toll

Also,

giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/hansen_03/

solar-center.stanford.edu/sun-on-earth/FAQ2.html

nytimes.com/1998/05/29/us/autos-converters-cut-smog-but-add-to-global-warming.html

faculty.fgcu.edu/twimberley/EnviroPol/EnviroPhilo/global_warmingNASA.pdf

thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(05)77777-1.pdf

pop.org/global-warming-not-health-threat-2/

brookings.edu/research/a-better-way-to-slow-global-climate-change/

euronet.nl/users/e_wesker/ew@shell/API-prop.html

>niwa.co.nz/education-and-training/schools/students/climate-change-global-warming-and-greenhouse-gases
I didn't see any of those predictions here

>fee.org/articles/global-warming-hot-problem-or-hot-air/
I still don't see any of the predictions mentioned. Also, you should know Adler is now convinced AGW is a serious problem.

washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/04/14/what-does-it-take-to-convince-libertarians-and-conservatives-that-climate-change-is-a-problem/?utm_term=.4f78c988b9aa

>fee.org/articles/global-politics-political-warming/
And again, not a single mention.

I thought it odd that you would need more than three links to source a few predictions. Now I'm beginning to think you just posted a bunch of random links in the hope that I wouldn't actually check them to see that they supported your argument.

Question: Why do you feel the need to lie about it if you actually believe that AGW isn't correct?

All right.

A long, long time ago, Europeans decides to force the local Jewish population into ghettos, and that made the Jews very, very mad....

>we can't predict how weather will be like
What do you mean by "we", Peasant?

This.

“Arctic specialist Bernt Balchen says a general warming trend over the North Pole is melting the polar ice cap and may produce an ice-free Arctic Ocean by the year 2000.” - June 8, 1972, Christian Science Monitor

“It is now pretty clearly agreed that CO2 content [in the atmosphere] will rise 25% by 2000. This could increase the average temperature near the earth’s surface by 7 degrees Fahrenheit. This in turn could raise the level of the sea by 10 feet. Goodbye New York. Goodbye Washington, for that matter.” - 1969, Lubos Moti, Czech physicist
“In ten year’s time, most of the low-lying atolls surrounding Tuvalu’s nine islands in the South Pacific Ocean will be submerged under water as global warming rises sea levels.” - March 29, 2001, CNN

“The planet could face an ‘ecological and agricultural catastrophe’ by the next decade if global warming trends continue.” - October 15, 1990 Carl Sagan

“Scientists are warning that some of the Himalayan glaciers could vanish within ten years because of global warming. A build-up of greenhouse gases is blamed for the meltdown, which could lead to drought and flooding in the region affecting millions of people.” - July 26, 1999 The Birmingham Post

“I think we’re in trouble. When you realize how little time we have left–we are now given not 10 years to save the rainforests, but in many cases five years. Madagascar will largely be gone in five years unless something happens. And nothing is happening.” - April 22, 1990 ABC, The Miracle Planet

If you can't find this shit on your own, you aren't even trying.

>Christian Science Monitor
>Fucking Lubos
>CNN
>Some pop-sci faggot
>The Birmingham Post
>ABC

Not a single credible source, scientific """"""""""communication"""""""""" is not a credible source of information, it never has been and it (probably) never will be.

nigga why do u exist if we can't model ur dad's sperm interacting with your mom's pussy? hoooow?

t. retort

skepticalscience.com/argument.php