Prove this wrong

Prove this wrong.
Protip: You Cannot

>Tesla anything but great
>Newton anything but Ancient Creator
kys

It's not a competition.

Do you not realize ALL mathematical thought stems from Archimedes?

This. I pray to Newton every day.

What about Maxwell? Where is Maxwell? Why nobody remembers Maxwell?

I'd put him on sub-par tier.

Newton did much more, also, Weierstrass need to be there

>I'd put him on sub-par tier.
Sub-par? Why would you put there the man that finally unified EM, who worked in the theory of color (and made the first color photography), mathematically proved that the Saturn Ring are pieces of loose material, established the basis for statistical physics and wrote poems about differential equations?

because most of that was trivial

meme tier : Newton

All you great-tier are Olympus-tier

Darwin is Olympus-tier. He is the Einstein of the biology, the one who change the biology for ever.

Curie is good-tier.

Rather than tiers you should plot them on a spectrum.

Where is Laplace ?

none of this matters really

everything is quantized, brainlet

>the biology

Irrational numbers aren't.

In quantum mechanics the wavefunction is a spectrum.

>Now that we know it is true, it is trivial. Surely I would have been able to figure it out before everyone knew about it.

my main man Gauss rekkin it

What a colossal waste of time. This chart implicitly paints its creator into moron-tier.

>no weierstrass, abel, hamilton, laplace, hilbert, hardy
>von neumann below wiser gods of the olympus
>cauchy below cantor
im fucking triggered

Ramanujan and Hilbert at the top. Everyone else should be lower down.

Why the fuck is Newton number one? He wasn't even the first person to discover calculus.

Also, Tao (meme or not) deserves to be on the list at this point.

>no Hilbert
>no Erdos

Vile.

isn't Archimedes the guy who discovered the water rises if you drop an object into the tub and then streaked through the town naked shouting "Eureka!"?

move newton to shit tier and replace him with leibniz

Men were but apes until Archimedes taught us to think.

>no feynman

where would you put him user

>galileo demi god
>Lagrange and cauchy not at least on Great tier
>Galois not on wiser god of the olympus tier

von Neumann is great tier faggots

Nye and Tyson do have some academic background but it's not their focus. It doesn't make sense to put them in there.

why the fuck isn't darwin top or 2nd tier

>no shinichi mochizuki
>no wildburguer

von Neumann is way too low

Forgot Edison: he was a businessman. Science was not his focus (not even communicating it). If you consider him any of a scientist, thus comparing his scientific breakthroughs with others, you might as well put Bill Gates, Zuckerberg, Sergey Brin or even fucking Moot in there.

You forgot me.

It's about achievements, not raw intellect. The world doesn't give a fuck if he can multiply and divide big numbers in his head or see the fourth dimension. It's what he did with his brain that matters.

>No wizard tier

Ramanyjan is a literal meme

He's just a pity story for being a poor slum boy.

Not once did he prove ANYTHING. Hardy proved everything for him. I'd like someone to give me 1(one) example where he proved a theorem by himself.

You can't say you're a mathematician if you can't prove and conjecture. It's like saying you're a NASCAR driver and you've never driven a car before.

Von Neumann is famous for his work, not being a human calculator.

His work in mathematics deserved him a Fields medal.

His work in Physics deserved him a Nobel Prize.

His work in literally creating game theory deserved him another Nobel Prize.

His work in computer science deserved him a Turing award.

The man did it all...

>curie
>sub par tier

she's the only one out of that group to have 2 nobels

>be Galois
>chad steals your girl
>challenge chad to a duel
>lose and die at 21

top cuck

not to mention he was part of the scientific rat pack that worked on the manhattan project.

where's Norman "non-conformin" Wildberger?

The intersphere is infected with suburbanites and southernites

Discussion is no longer possible

>Protip
Anyone who is retarded enough to post a 'protip' thread is a fucking faggot. Neck yourself boy. You posted in the wrong neighborhood.

Ramanujan should be way higher in the hierarchy. He was a freak.

lol no
ancient mesoamerican math > ancient western math
come at me bruh

>Einstein
>Not Poincare
All of Einstein's math is stolen from Poincare.

Hello, Mr. Anonymous.

I am a time traveling Phd candidate at Oxford University from the year 2640. May I cite your work for the doctoral thesis I am doing on the New Atheist movement, how they proved once and for all that God is carnal, and then proceeded to murder It? I need more material on contemporary opinions of the early New Atheists.

Please forgive me if my simple-speak contains errors.

Darwin is effectively the ancient creator of biology. Nothing in biology makes sense without evolution

I just hope they all had fun with math.

He easily ranks with AT LEAST Demi God tier

>It's about achievements, not raw intellect

Are you sure you are talking about Neumann?

>no mention of LINUS PAULING
YOU FUCKS

even giving Nye a tier at all is too much. If you put Nye on there then you pretty much have to include every human being on earth

there's no tier for "never had anything to do with science"

Did you read it on quora, you're a disgrace.

>the older a scientist is, the wiser he is
kys

Where is Paul Erdos? Surely if Euler is there Erdos deserves to be there.

If this was true Newton would be the top tier for creating Calculus, the most influential mathematics of all time.
Archimedes didn't really change the course of history. Mathematics was already well underway at that time.

>physics fags
ew

also Gödel and Cantor belong in Wiser Gods tier

indian ESLs fucking leave already you're insufferable

decent opinions tho

turing is only good
we wouldnt be on computers had it not been for him

>talking shit about my main nigga Cantor
the graph doesn't even mention Gödel; it should be entirely disregarded

>calculus
>more influential than 20th century Set Theory, CS, and complexity theory
fucking leave you incredible middle-schooler

this entire post
i'm sick of faggots (especially indian grad students) constantly sucking the Ramanujan dick

>1 + 1 = BEHEAD THE SACRIFICE FOR THE BLOOD GOD
woah so enlightening very thoughtful wow

>hurr durr this person didn't follow the rules for influencing the world

James Maxwell should be up with Newton, and Faraday probably should too
(t. ee fag)

>Curie at anything but great tier

Oooh boy.

Those people aren't comparable. One is Euler, and the other is just an interesting guy that proved a lot of inconsequential things (but a few good things).

>Hurr durr Garfield has had so many comics! It's as good as Calving and Hobbes

>Nye never had anything to do with science
what do you mean by this?

>>no mention of LINUS PAULING
>YOU FUCKS
Because he became crazy and started promoting the "orthomolecular medicine".

"A Problem In Dynamics - Poem by James Clerk Maxwell"
An inextensible heavy chain
Lies on a smooth horizontal plane,
An impulsive force is applied at A,
Required the initial motion of K.

Let ds be the infinitesimal link,
Of which for the present we’ve only to think;
Let T be the tension, and T + dT
The same for the end that is nearest to B.
Let a be put, by a common convention,
For the angle at M ’twixt OX and the tension;
Let Vt and Vn be ds’s velocities,
Of which Vt along and Vn across it is;
Then Vn/Vt the tangent will equal,
Of the angle of starting worked out in the sequel.

In working the problem the first thing of course is
To equate the impressed and effectual forces.
K is tugged by two tensions, whose difference dT
Must equal the element's mass into Vt.
Vn must be due to the force perpendicular
To ds’s direction, which shows the particular
Advantage of using da to serve at your
Pleasure to estimate ds’s curvature.
For Vn into mass of a unit of chain
Must equal the curvature into the strain.

Thus managing cause and effect to discriminate,
The student must fruitlessly try to eliminate,
And painfully learn, that in order to do it, he
Must find the Equation of Continuity.
The reason is this, that the tough little element,
Which the force of impulsion to beat to a jelly meant,
Was endowed with a property incomprehensible,
And was "given," in the language of Shop, "inexten-sible."
It therefore with such pertinacity odd defied
The force which the length of the chain should have modified,
That its stubborn example may possibly yet recall
These overgrown rhymes to their prosody metrical.
The condition is got by resolving again,
According to axes assumed in the plane.
If then you reduce to the tangent and normal,
You will find the equation more neat tho’ less formal.
The condition thus found after these preparations,
When duly combined with the former equations,
Will give you another, in which differentials
(When the chain forms a circle), become in essentials
No harder than those that we easily solve
In the time a T totum would take to revolve.

Now joyfully leaving ds to itself, a-
Ttend to the values of T and of a.
The chain undergoes a distorting convulsion,
Produced first at A by the force of impulsion.
In magnitude R, in direction tangential,
Equating this R to the form exponential,
Obtained for the tension when a is zero,
It will measure the tug, such a tug as the "hero
Plume-waving" experienced, tied to the chariot.
But when dragged by the heels his grim head could not carry aught,
So give a its due at the end of the chain,
And the tension ought there to be zero again.
From these two conditions we get three equations,
Which serve to determine the proper relations
Between the first impulse and each coefficient
In the form for the tension, and this is sufficient
To work out the problem, and then, if you choose,
You may turn it and twist it the Dons to amuse.

>some brainlet normie pleb sits down and attempts to sort the names of scientists they have overheard

>the only woman in the list is subpar-tier
uhm, sexist much?

Make an hero tier

>The man who pretty much founded theoretical physics is sub-par tier

Moron.

>No Leibniz
>No Bernoulli
>No Pascal
>No Boole

Yep, this chart serves as more of an indication to what tier the OC was, than those included in it.

why is she such a perfect waifu?

>Newton
What about Leibniz?

Cums

>uses infinitesimals

i think we should discredit anything this hack did

nonstandard analysis is better than epsilon delta autism

That's why Einstein is considered one the greatest physicists of all time.

>Fermat
>Darwin
>Tesla
>Curie

They deserve more, specially Fermat and Darwin.

yeah lets just forget the arabs and the indians who basically created the number system and other stuff

>no Leibniz, the inventor of Calculus

this, brahmagupta is up there with the best

gauss bitchslaps them all desu

al khwarizmi , aryabhata and many more

Nye should have his own tier below all of them.

same reason nye and degrasse are considered so nowadays

...

the last 4 don't even belong on this image.

Bill Nye isn't a scientist, he's an educator

We're talking about the importance of their achievements, not how many nobel prizes they won, especailly since many of these scientists lived before the Nobel Prize. John Bardeen is obviously not the GOAT physicist.