Is it possible to have 200% of an apple?

Is it possible to have 200% of an apple?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banach–Tarski_paradox
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

If you bought to many of them yes.

Allow me to reword.
Is it possible to have 200% of 1 apple?

Maybe it doesn't go through your mind that 2 apples may exist?

fanbois are convinced that no other kind even exist

Yes but the existence of two apples is not what I am asking about.

I'm asking can I have 200% of a single apple.

200% = 3x
Percentage difference = (change in percentage)/ (original percentage) x 100

So to have 200% of one apple, you'll have to 200% = 3-1 apples/1 apple x 100%, it's fucking elementary mathematics you're all fucking stupid, I'm getting out of here.

>200% of a single apple
That's two single apples

But 200% means just that. That you have 2 of the same object. If you mean that these two aren't exactly the same then you can consider cloning the first one

>Percentage difference
he didn't say 200% more
100% of an apple is an apple
if you have 1 apple, then 100% more apples is 2 apples.
you are stupid

The question is literally just 1 = 1+1 true or false. and everyone is answering two.

The correct answer is false.

It only says "200% of a (single) apple"
That translates to 200%*1 apple which equals to 2 apples
There is no point in 200%=1 apple
200% of what? For example 200% of apple halfs are really equal to 1 apple

>The question is literally just 1 = 1+1 true or false.
That's not the question though.
>What is 200% of 1
that's the question m8

No, it's an abstraction. You need to clearly define some things before logically breaking it down. You could consider doubling the size of the apple to be 200% of the original apple. It all depends on what terms you're thinking within. AKA it's useless, pseudo-philosophical semantics.

2 apples = 200 %

[citation needed]

200% implies 2, an implies 1.

You can't go outside the 100% spectrum.

>You can't go outside the 100% spectrum
You were born with an IQ of 3
So now it's six.
OK, your hypothesis seems to hold.

IQ is a social construct and is part of a spectrum.

Take a sample size of apples of a specific variety, and find the average size of an apple. Then, fine one of the same variety that is twice the mass, there you have found 200% of an apple.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banach–Tarski_paradox

>mfw everyone falls for this obvious bait. the answer is just no.

Maybe, you could have another apple that is 100% bigger than your implied reference apple

it depends on how do you mathematically define an apple?

is it defined by the geometry (1 spheroid object) or by volume? (green apple is 200% more apple than the red)

Do you need to have a normal pumpkin in your possession to know that a giant pumpkin is giant?

Not OP but related question
If a nutrition label has 400% of something then what is that 400% with respect to? Itself? Daily serving recommended? I've seen stuff with 400% vitamin c

200% of a single apple is an apple that takes the form of two apples

the latter

Yes - that is, if we were to bring in the special circumstance where there exists a properly defined unit for 'apples' ; then, you may come across an apple which is a genetic outlier, and is 200% that of the unit value. This unit value may be defined with respect to some property, such as volume, density, or both.

Why aren't these kinds of threads just instantly deleted?

Yes, just make the default state of 1 entity 200% in your current lexicon and there you go, 200% = 1 apple.

no
yes