Whenever I study computer science I think of stuff like "monad in X is just a monoid in the category of endofunctors of X, with product × replaced by composition of endofunctors and unit set by the identity endofunctor." -- as what Saunders Mac Lane, William Lawvere did/does is relevant to my Computer Science interest.
I keep hearing "code monkeys" term thrown around. I program, I love programming, I don't refer to myself as a "code monkey" as I doubt most people that use that term understand functional data structures, algorithmic complexity or what Cartesian closed categories are.
Carson Lewis
Why didn't you explain some of Kolmogorov's ideas instead of that inane bullshit? It's would've been much more interesting.
Christopher Cox
>look at me I can spout basic category jargon aren't I so deep back to the app mines pajeet
Alexander Robinson
Everyone takes CS seriously until they understand it, at which point it becomes trivial.
This is especially pertinent to general abstract nonsense that explicitly adopts the trivialization of everything as its goal.
Carson Flores
it's literally just applied logic.
Kayden Morales
>$350K per year >not taken seriously
You're an idiot.
Cooper Collins
Computer Science jargons are part of a spectrum of word diarrhea.
Austin Johnson
Math is literally just logic
Mason Young
None of you code monkeys have solved pic related and you expect to be taken seriously.
Face it. You have no imagination or even any understanding of advanced mathematics. Your spectrum of knowledge is limited.
Cooper Cooper
Because you only have to do low level math
Because the job market for CS is particularly fucked what with the comparatively big risk of being replaces by pajeet
Because it was shilled by people as the "best stem major ever", so naturally when people see it's shortcomings it became a meme
