Is pop-science really where we are going? Is science really going to become a...

>It's LGBTTIQQ2SAA+
No, it's LGBTTIQQ2SAA+OP.

>But don't tell me that there are anymore than two options for what sex you are. You either have have two X's or an X and a Y.

How would you identify this person? They have a penis and testis but are karyotypically XX

This syndrome occurs in approximately four or five in 100,000 individuals, making it less common than Klinefelter syndrome

A genetic fuck up. If they were an accepted genotype and phenotype combo they wouldn't be born sterile.

Fuck off with this intersex shit. It's like saying since Cancer cells exist all my cells should be able to mutate into whatever the fuck they want

>it doesn't happen frequently so it doesn't count

Intersex individuals show that biological sex can have a variety of outcomes.

And viability more than fertility has to do with what is "accepted" by biology. If it wasn't accepted it would have been lethal.

And you didn't answer my question. Is that person male or female?

Wew, I haven't see /pol/ this mad in years, they are still moaning.

>lethal
Except that is lethal. It can't genetically reproduce.
And no they don't show that biological sex can have a variety of outcomes because they only outcome they have is not being able to reproduce.
XX syndrome patients have testes, so yeah they're male since they present it.
Not that it matters because again, they can't reproduce.

This is different from a tranny who can reproduce but fell for the transitioning meme.

...

>Except that is lethal

You apparently do not understand what "lethality" means in the context of genetics.

And that goes back to
>"don't tell me that there are anymore than two options for what sex you are. You either have have two X's or an X and a Y."
which misunderstands the spectrum of results that can occur during sexual reproduction.

Reminder that Veeky Forums is mostly a lefty board that most probably attended the stupid march.

t. not part of the hive mind

zoz