Is geoengineering a useful tool in combating climate change?

Fine, I'll learn French, even though I already learnt Japanese for industry (pointless now as they're too scared to try again).

It owuld be in ONE important way -- it might mitigate the warming effects of CO2.

Would decreasing (or at least stopping the increase) be better? Yeah, if it was economically and politically feasible. But it is pretty clear that it is not, and doing something to partially mitigate effects seems better, to me, than doing nothing.

it can be but there are many hurdles
>countries would have to work together
>we would have to make sure they don't cause unexpected issues

You could always get a masters in plasma physics or something and go fusion.

Sometimes Veeky Forums can really give me a good chuckle

The fuck it wouldn't...

You know how fossil fuels got there in the first place, right? If we can geoengineer the biome to photosynthesize just 5% more than it currently does, you could completely neutralize CO2 output from fossil fuel consumption.

>>countries would have to work together

Not necessarily -- a project to pump sulfer compounds into the upper atmosphere and duplicate cooling caused by a major volcano could be done by a single country. Things involving increased sea spray could be done by a single nation. Etc.

>>we would have to make sure they don't cause unexpected issues

The nice thing is, if they do, most are easy to stop or reverse. But we are assured that greenhouse warming has negative issues -- doing nothing may be more risky than trying something.

What plant is the most efficient at sealing away carbon for how much land it takes up? Bamboo?

Find out a way to grow over the sahara desert with bamboo.

>fukupashita
kek

this is a good idea. maybe stop cutting them all down too.