Pilot wave theory

no moron they are unknowable because they by definition cant be directly measured

*With our current understanding of the universe they cant be directly measured.

Fixed that for ya bud.

>by definiton
Literaly reading comprehension.

Definitely agree with the guy, I think understanding why our models works the way they do, is helpful when coming up with new theory's. The further we get into the math without seeing physical reality, the harder it gets to get your head around our current understanding and ahead of it.

I doubt Einstein would have had his amazing insights for general relativity if he just dismissed it as "its just the way the math works out, whatever. All i need to do is find equations that fit."
And what is worse now, is that I hear a lot of physicist say that even thinking about the physicality of spacetime should be left to Philosophers. Like they will come up with any great insights.

I understand their current way of working is very effective, but I still feel they are kinda just finding their way around in the dark, which must feel tedious.

I suppose the earth is the center of the solar system too then? That was scientific consensus at one point after all, theres no way our understanding of something could be wrong.

You literally can't read anything im writing so youre forced to make up arguments. Nice. If you want to understand pilot waves please go read a book on it or atleast the wikipedia page moron.

>"its just the way the math works out

But that's pretty much what he said, the strong equivalence principle was his way of fitting SR inside GR.

>i doubt einstein would have had his amazing insights for general relativity if he just sismissed it as "its just the way the math works out, whatever. all i need to do is find equations that fit"
thats literally the majority of his work though. Nearly his entire work was about how strange the math works out to be and then decades later people experimentally tested it

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hidden_variable_theory

>i.e., that quantum mechanics is ultimately incomplete, and that a complete theory would provide descriptive categories to account for all observable behavior and thus avoid any indeterminism.

Get rekt kid.

You didnt even read the page yourself you fucking moron.
>In August 2011,Roger ColbeckandRenato Rennerpublished a proof that any extension of quantum mechanical theory, whether using hidden variables or otherwise, cannot provide a more accurate prediction of outcomes, assuming that observers can freely choose the measurement settings.
>In this sense, we show the following: under the assumption that measurement settings can be chosen freely, quantum theory really is complete".

next time read the fucking thing you post before you post it.
Is this what its like to argue with highschoolers?