>tfw you publish complete fucking garbage in a top journal and realize that science is basically trash
Tfw you publish complete fucking garbage in a top journal and realize that science is basically trash
Luis Cruz
Easton Watson
what's so bad about your publication?
Aiden Morales
The stamp-collecting variety might be, yeah. But that is being automated away and thank fuck for that.
Oliver Richardson
I know that feel, OP. It's one of the reasons I left academia for the private sector. The amount of bullshit floating around will make seriously question whether we know anything about anything or if the whole damn scientific enterprise isn't a fucking circus.
Lucas Bell
>tried to publish an article in a climate science journal last year
>was told that it was basically bulletproof
>reflected because my "claims cast doubt on the consensus" or some such nonsense
>email the publication to find out more
Long story, short they straight up told me I was being an obstacle to grant funding by trying to publish evidence that casts doubt on anthropocentric climate change.
Christian Morgan
Is this bait? Or would you perhaps enlighten us to what your findings were?
Jack Taylor
>Is this bait?
No. If you are against the consensus, you are out. The science is settled and only papers that approves the science are published.
Parker Stewart
>(20.17)(10^2)
>not using your rights to believe in alt-science
when will brainlets ever learn
Landon Richardson
But I am legitimately curious. Please post what you have. Getting tired of all the same anti-AGW infographs being posted so maybe you can give us some new material.
Adam Howard
Too bad it's just /pol/ trolling.
Brayden Taylor
It was my high school journal really and the paper is based on some statistics on the drying times of my mom's laundry.
Basically there's a correlation between the appearance of anthropocentric climate change headlines and days were the clothes took more time to dry.
I think they are using this to reinforce the man-made climate change idea whenever there's bad weather as a compensatory strategy.
Brody Ramirez
libtards BTFO
Oliver Williams
Science isn't about journals and accolades. It's about seeking answers with a systematic approach. We just had a generation of "popularizers" and media that have dumbed everyone down. Treating "Science" like a thing or the result and ignoring the process. Using "Scientists say" as a kind of royal "we".
arstechnica.com
nytimes.com
Owen Fisher
kek
Jason Brooks
You didn't get published because you're an idiot.
Ryan Martinez
You got baited because you're an idiot.
Elijah Bennett
>It's about seeking answers with a systematic approach.
prove that science brings answers
Lucas Ortiz
This, so much this.
Ryan Mitchell
So have most of my former professors.
Its pathetic above anything else.
Jordan Hall
>wait a year worrying if you'll get published
>scorn the journal for accepting you
???
Cameron James
Impressive
Colton Gonzalez
B-b-but [spoiler]I'm /pol/ trolling what I presume to be a false flagging antifaggot[/spoiler]
Haven't read any convincing anti-AGW papers so far.