Is this ranking correct?

Is this ranking correct?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=VZiWKmhuaZE
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Rankings are fucking gay.

Exactly, everyone is equal, some just more equal than others.

>Galileo

Kill yourself

You forget wizard tier

Sometimes I get depressed thinking about what it must have felt to be Archimedes.

You have all these crazy ideas that even border into modern analysis but there is
1) No language to properly discuss those ideas
2) No one besides you is smart enough to understand them. Every other "mathematician" is jerking off to triangles.

It must be shit. It must be totally be shit. The first thing we have to do when we invent time travel is to go back in time, find Archimedes and softly whisper to him

[math]\text{The limit exists if and only if } \forall \epsilon>0 \exists M>0 : N _1,N_2> M \implies |a_{N_1} - a_{N_2} | < \epsilon [/math]

Deepak Chopra should be the Ultimate.

>You have all these crazy ideas that even border into modern analysis but there is
like what

...

Archimedes anticipated modern calculus and analysis by applying concepts of infinitesimals and the method of exhaustion to derive and rigorously prove a range of geometrical theorems, including the area of a circle, the surface area and volume of a sphere, and the area under a parabola.

fucking kys for not sourcing that and making it look like your own words

underage scum

It was not my intention. I just quickly got the wikipedia page, searched for the keyword analysis and copy pasted it.

I had to be quick man, I am posting with one hand and jerking off with the other.

>von Neumann not god tier
kek

it's incomplete

It's 2 seconds on google you fucking primate

Here's a little addition

Darwin and Freud subpar though. Although it all may seam obvious now, it all wasn't back then. And they've helped a LOT. Also, Paul Dirac is massively underrated

Darwin is great but Freud never helped.

Pythagoras was pretty much common core philosopher though.
>square root of twoo ia s s notirrational number
>"but it can't be expressed as a ratio"
>yes it can, you fucking brainlet
>just increase the size of the sides proportionally
>"here's a proof that it isn't rational"
>that is IMPOSSIBLE NATURE IS PERFECT EVERYTHING IS A RATIO
>"no"
>BURN THE WITCH

I think I had a stroke at the first
>text

Pls remove Freud

>Darwin is great but Freud never helped.
>Pls remove Freud
Agree, Freud is shit and not even a scientist.

>Tao above Wiles
>Fermat below von Neumann, Turing, Ramanajun
>Tesla, Freud there at all, and above Hawking

You don't actually study science, do you?

I'm finishing up my PhD in pure math at princeton. why?

d i r a c

Where the heck is grotendieck

Watching over all of us.

dirac was a sperg

Fermi so underrated, none solid state fags will never know

That's why he was so great user

Even other science spergs thought he was a major sperg

Ftfy

nice spectrum desu

what do the fucking letters mean?

Where is Gödel

It's like letter grades in school, with S>A.
This convention comes from Japan.

Why is Hawking so low? He's not just pop sci from what I know, he's made some real contributions to his field.

youtube.com/watch?v=VZiWKmhuaZE

Archimedes and Newton were pretty smart for their time but the average scholar, I'd say, is smarter. you listed people like Tao and Einstein and below Newton and Archimedes... they're definitely higher in absolute intelligence and knowledge. Archimedes and Newton had the privilege of being the first to establish something... it's not that what they did was that hard to figure out.

I'd completely disagree with this list.

>ramanajun
>Just good
Kill yourself

surely this list is about the profundity of their work & achievements, not what their IQ is.