Quantum teleportation is not real is it? Be honest

These guys are swearing by quantm teleportation. When really all this shit is just beating round a pad. At no stage. By my must I define and determine. Does the particle ever correlate with the page. No question mark hoooyaaaahhhhhhhoOooBOOOOTZ

you're shitting the board up, of course I'm going to tell you to fuck off. come back when you want to discuss science instead of idiotic popsci.

not even that, literally
>HURR I DONT LIKE THE NAME PHYSICISTS ARE USING
when you don't even know any physics
honestly not only fuck off, kill yourself too

Doing something to one particle (observing) effects another particle some distance away without any interaction between them. How is that not teleportation? What name would you call it? Spooky action at a distance?

At no stage I repeat, does the particle one might right, be the particle. At no stage by one right defines no correlation between thigh writes and any particle. At no stage does any particle correlate with any written words, or exists no particle.

Who promised you that man. Writing down the spin of two in a row means it's in your head

Your blocking shit out with your head that's stopping you from seeing. If you list an entangled pair okay, that's two things on paper. Your head makes you think that your writing about a particlllllleeeee!!!! Common little busy you can pull your self out of thereeeeeeeeee

Contradict between the 2 y's above

There's a whole lot of schizophrenia in this thread.

>Who promised you that man.
The paper that was published and reviewed by the entire scientific community? If you think that's an unreliable source, then there is no hope in changing your mind.

>Writing down the spin of two in a row means it's in your head
I have no idea what you are talking about. They make sure the effect is not just "in their head" by using real world clocks to measure when the information is observed. The reason it's called teleportation is because the information of the spin state is already at the second particle instantaneously after the first particle is observed, yet hidden variables have been shown to not exist. So the information is already there, yet it wasn't there prior to the first observation, and nothing physical could have transferred this information between the first and second observations because distance between the two observations is too far for light to travel in that time.

It's not that hard to understand, and the only reason you don't believe it is because it goes against your logic and intuition. It's been experimentally verified though, so unless you have trust issues with the scientific community there should be no problem. And if you do have trust issues...well I suggest you start with global warming before tackling quantum mechanics.

Dude there scamming you. What's gonna happen if I point out that clocks font show particle spin