All this makes me very sad because I'm not a chad.
Since the sexual revolution, girls have had the freedom to only reproduce with chads. By chads I mean sexually attractive, smart and relatively wealthy men. Even if women are in a relationship with losers, and by losers I mean the bottom 80% of men, there are high chances that children are still produced from the seed of chads due to cuckoldry. I suppose old civilizations that enforced monogamy had halted human improvement because everyone got to reproduce even if they weren't worth anything. Now that we are back on track, does it mean the human race is improving in general because only the best seed is being used to impregnate women?
Absolutely. Sexual liberation was the greatest thing to happen to humankind since agriculture.
Blake Lee
I would argue Arab countries are worse since the men can have up to 4 wives.
Dylan Baker
arabs also marry their cousins like the pakis. Pakis in the UK don't have 4 wives but their IQ is still lower than the Indians that they are otherwise very genetically similar to. It's safe to say cousin marriage is the problem there and that's a different issue.
Lucas Watson
>making humanity better fertility trends are dysgenic, especially among liberals, where IQ and education are negatively correlated with children sired. among conservatives there's a slight bias towards intelligence, but dumb conservatives still breed more than smart ones, and conservative whites are a minority of the population anyways. in the future, we may be stronger or bigger, but we certainly won't be smarter.
Noah Gonzalez
But money is related to intelligence isn't it? Women are also going for the money
Charles Cook
You may be looking at students in your vicinity and draw that conclusion. Fact of the matter is that most of the population is working class "bimbos" that live in a fairly brainless routine and the intelligence boost is low. Any health boost are counteracted by the continuous change of technology. What smartphones does to the necks of children alone is much more severe than any fucking natural selection of more broad shouldered guys.
Jacob Cox
>But money is related to intelligence isn't it? 40 years ago yes, now not so much.
Ryder Phillips
OPs argument is pretty much refuted by the first 3 minutes of idiocracy.
