Feels over Reals (Literally)

do fucking white american males count as "diversity" in Australia? If so then I need to move there

Well, maybe the immigration into australia is pretty low as they are literally an island. Thus, the local women need someone to dominate and sexually colonize them given that their males are too cucked. And we know that beggers ain't choosers so I suppose they take in anything that is foreign.

Apart from maybe integrals, what's the problem with using rationals? Epsilon-delta definition of limits/continuity/differentiation still work for rationals

Intermediate value theorem is false for continuous functions Q -> Q.

But there is a way to work constructively with the real field, and that's how I know Wildburguer is a hack and a fraud.

I can sympathise with wanting to try and build rational mathematics, because it's (in some ways) simpler and neater than the reals and no-one else is really doing it.
I have no idea what the fuck Wildburger's deal with limits is. Yes, historically they were pretty damn fuzzy, but I'm under the impression that the modern construction is watertight.

The modern definition is rigorous but unintuitive, and constructionists like Wildberfer disagree with it on principle

It's funny that there is a totally algebraic treatment of calculus with infinitesimals but you have to fuck around with ultrafilters which would drive Wildberger up the wall.

10 buckaroonies says wildberger will invent the hyperreals, but will define [math]\epsilon[/math] as a very specific rational number. Probably [math]\frac{1}{10^{200}}[/math] since that's his favorite.

Kek'd at pic

Does Wildberger really try and argue mathematics from physical analogies like that? Because I'm not even a math student, and that's still obviously pathetic.