What is the best form of government, scientifically speaking?

What is the best form of government, scientifically speaking?

Meritocracy.
[spoiler]But only if 100% inheritance tax can be enforced, which is impossible)[/spoiler]

>Government
>Literally a monopoly on aggression
Talking about the best piece of shit is useless. Governments are bad, come up with something else.

Read Politics by Aristotle.
Real good insight the topic, if not, the best.

Anarchy.

Aristotle says aristocracy, but that the corruption of the best then becomes the worst (i.e. it becomes authautharian) so then democracy is the best because it is safe.

Wrong. Money inheritance is not the only factor that break meritocracy. Social situation, location, genetics... Meritocracy an illusion.

Important decisions made by an aristocracy, democractic election for meme options like presidents

Democracy can be corrupted into demagoguery such as we are seeing today.

Best form is democracy with limited suffrage, Rhodesia-style.

Anarchy is a ridiculous childish dream. Let's say all systems were overthrown. There would still be resources, goods, territory, and knowledge to be squabbled over and those things would not be evenly distributed. Whoever has the most would wield the power, and they would set up infrastructure of some kind to maintain that. Immediately we would have government again and it would be a less collaborative version that would have to go through all the same growing pains we've seen in the last few millennia.

Depends what you mean by "best"

That sounds like something that can be somewhat mathematically calculated.

fascism

Technocratic old-left Zizekian-Leninist proletarian democracy with healthy patriotism and oversized education and R&D departments.

the one where I have ultimate authority over everything. Don't worry plebe, I will have the best scientists in their fields providing recommendations on all the decisions for the best possible result for my population.

Anarchy. Let natural selection run its course. If we are good enough as a species we won't die out, if not then make room for another, better species.

All of human culture is a result of natural selection taking its course.

a system in witch the leader does not know hes leading and thus would be incorruptible

Douglas adams had the answer all along.

When we look at most successful countries in the world, then they are almost all capitalist democracies with strong social safety net, liberalism etc.

enlightened absolutism would probably be the best in theory, problem with is how dangerous it becomes in case of corruption. So in practice it would suck.

In all honesty, probably the "real" form of Communism. With that being said, I'd never want to try it because of all the massive failures there have been because of it throughout history. With that being the case, I'd probably say a "light" form of Socialism. It's no surprise that Capitalism has been a proven method throughout history and has brought us so far in terms of societal advancement. We are about to hit another major technological advancement boom that will put to many people out of work though. With the next advancements in artificial intelligence and robotics, the majority of the population will be put of out work in favor or a more reliable/cost effective work force.

This isn't a bad thing, and jobs won't wither away entirely either. Instead of 75% of the population working though, it'll probably drop down to about 10-20% of the population needing to work. With that being the case, I think we'll need to implement a "one child policy" to keep the human population at a reasonable level (within growing populations at the very least).

direct democracy

He said best not worst

Communism.

Legit opinion amongst most people in my faculty (Math & Physics).

AI overlord

What a surprise uni faculty is filled with commy scum.

What the fuck is a brainlet like you doing on Veeky Forums?

If you have never set foot in a university you shouldn't be here. Go back to the factory floor, peasant.

kys

This.

Uni student here

If you think uni makes you smarter you must be a special kind of retard