Thus

>the

>let blank be blank
>consider blank where blank is blank

>today

>It can be shown, that

>therefore

>we
you fucking jews, you wrote a shitty book and you made it cost 100 pounds and now I have to buy it so that I can pass this fucking module and you dare speak to me as if you're a fucking group of malefic jews? you don't even dare address e 1-to-1, face to face? you think there's strength in numbers? you think you can ally against us goyim and destroy us because we aren't united like you are?

Fuck off back to pol piggot

A PhD student in my group insists on repeatedly using "which's" in his dissertation.

>in conclusion

...

>Suppose

What the hell? Context?

There isn't really any context. He just thinks it's correct and usual english, and stubbornly ignores everyone who disagrees.

>∴

>spectrum

Can you give an example of how he uses "which's" in a sentence?

"The material which's properties are..."

Kek

I always write "we", even on individual assignments

You should correct it to "whom'st" next time you see a "which's"

>"The material whom'st'd've'll properties are..."

What nationality is he?

've ~ have
's ~ is
'd ~ would
'st ~ whilst/while

Language evolves over time. It's great.

German

>for the sake of contradiction
>hence
>Now,
>I

>thitherto

I always think of it as including the reader, like you're talking someone through a proof.

>ergo

So what am I allowed to write that doesn't trigger frogs on Veeky Forums?

>extrapolate

>if you don't remember X, revise pages 40-162 in book Y

>corroborate

>i.e.

>furthermore

>viz.

>insofar

>iff

>(why?)

> QED

>assuming the axiom of choice

>adds up to zero

must'n't've

>(sic)