Bump. I actually like this channel but this video made me dissmiss the whole channel

I think he likes that it's a channel with conservative views on many things, but he doesn't expect the full conservative package - i.e. religion.

The first half of this video is completely right, modern science is far too confident in the idea that extraterrestrial life is common or even out there at all. However, the fact that we find ourselves here despite overwhelming odds is far more elegantly explained by the anthropic principle than by a creator.

the main issue is that this planet isn't "life-sustaining" the life on it has adapted to live here lo

This post is too reasonable you're making me angry with your reasonableness.

ooh, he bad

>The video was obviously recorded a long time ago, given that PragerU likes to add so much editing
>Lets say that guy said all that shit like 3 weeks ago
>He got paid to say that and now he is gone. Doesn't even think or care about the debate. He is gone buying some hookers with that money.
>We know that PragerU speakers are never told to follow up the debate in the comments. So again, the guy is long gone enjoying his money
>Just now, 3 weeks after he got paid and fucked his hookers, some autists on the internet got buttmad and are now rushing to the comment section of a channel he doesn't own nor knows barely anything about to give him counter arguments
>The only counter argument he needs is that tight 12 year old asian pussy you can get if you can pay enough and know the right person

You "debaters" fucking make me laugh, and I'm an atheist. At least go back to debating yourselves about climate change or some shit. That way at least the person on the other side at least knows you exist.

Not an argument.

PragerU is a joke, by the way. Don't know if you knew.

>dimiss an otherwise brilliant channel because of one dumbass

Fake and gay

The point is not to debate the creator of the video but to convince other people who have watched the video and are reading the comments, you supreme autist.

pragerU isn't perfect, but it's necessary in our politically homogeneous social media circles which often push liberalist "science"

science isn't conservative or progressive, but the liberal side isn't letting up, so we might as well get exposure on the conservative view and interpolate from there.

>polite sage for non/sci/

>pragerU
lmfao
so much for the autistic right

>PragerU
Good Goy.

We shouldn't tolerate using "science!" to push any agenda. PragerU does just that. It doesn't balance out the conversation it just drags it further in a shittier direction

>This fucking asshat is so fucking wrong about everything he said in this fucking video.
Quality refutation of the central point right there.

>he likes PragerU
Christ user, can I get some content with that pure ideology?

Science can never argue for or against god. Science exists within the physical universe, which is defined by the metaphysical "settings" of the universe. You can't perform science on metaphysics. Science is very good at explaining the "hows" of things. It really doesn't ever explain a "why does any of this happen at all" to almost anything. Why does anything behave the way it does? It's not a question of finer and finer details, it's a question of just asking why anything happen instead of some other way. We can do science to find out what's allowed in this set of metaphysical rules, but we can't test these settings and rules at all.

God is a meta-meta-physical being, who is capable of adjusting the metaphysical rules of the universe, and is not going to be affected by them. This is so beyond science we can't even begin to start to think about how this would work. They're wholly, utterly incompatible. It's a frankly ridiculous notion to try to do this. It's something at least twice removed from and beyond our universe.

They feature many different people, some better than others.

i hate prager university so fucking much. They occasionally have some good videos on there, but then they give a voice to the most irrational conspiracy nuts, to the point that you can't share any of their videos, because it would discredit your point simply by being associated with those fucks.
I think their choice of speakers is simply "what oppinion is the most contrarian on any topic? Let's get someone expressing that oppinion vocally"

a question to you astrophysicists:
Could the universe be even MORE fine tuned to support life?
Or are the conditions we are living in really the best possible universe?

what is Veeky Forumss oppinion on Lawrence Krauss?
youtube.com/watch?v=7ImvlS8PLIo
youtube.com/watch?v=UIDlIWYRjK8

he argues for a universe that simply "happened to exist"
but i'm too unknowledgeable in matters of physics/too stupid that i could follow his argumentations

>fine tuned
[citation needed]
First, the term "tuned" automatically implies a creator, which makes it a leading question.
Secondly, "fine" is a problem.
We've only seen one universe, ever.
Creationists like to say that if the gravitational constant were even slightly different, yadda yadda yadda...
The problem with that statement is, since we don't have a bunch of different universes to compare, we have no idea what the normal range for the gravitational constant is.
For all we know, almost every universe in existence has a UGC almost exactly what ours is.
Or maybe not, we just don't know.

>Could the universe be even MORE fine tuned to support life?
It's unclear what you're asking.
Life as we know it is self-tuned for this particular universe.
If things were any different, they just wouldn't be the same.

Bitches don't know about the self organization of dynamical systems

if you actually think prager has produced a single good video then you are subhuman