My (potential) physics breakthrough

That's because copenhagen plays with Wave function collapse. Saying that it acts as a wave until the wave function collapses.

This however removes the ability of a particle moving on that wave to reverse its effects.

However I'm being severely BTFO by the thread for not having compiled my shit into a completed model yet and I'm not willing to share sensitive snippets yet so I think I'll retreat for now. I'll try to come back when I have at least attempted to have a mathematical model for the effects of the lingering pilot wave field on gravitons in quantum field theory.

Thanks for at least reading the thread.

I believe in you user. We just need to see a little more to fully understand what you're proposing. Good luck.

Can't really give you any advice but just wanted to say thanks for showing me a new way of thinking about things I hadn't considered.

OP, I think your idea to back off for a while and then present your theories may be best. It seems like you have just started your work on the subject. Also, if I may, what led you to challenge the Cohpenhagen interpretation?

>Pilot waves
>QFT
>Gravitons
>QFT

No user, no. Also why are you surprised that people are asking for some basic information before investing any time in this, likely, bullshit idea.

I believe in you user! I've always been suspicious of the copenhagen interpretation

>no data
>no equations

get the FUCK out of my Veeky Forums

You haven't posted a single idea yet. Those jumbles of words are not physics ideas.

>without giving away broad details:
>i can prove my dick is solid gold if i can omit details

why would the wave move backwards?

I'm on board, hook me up nigga.

Maybe you can draw a connection between the fact that to be able to free the vacuum of its energy you would need a huge amount of energy which in turn would fall into the playground of relativity. Maybe vacuum energy is the inverse of it.

>breakthrough in physics
>I need mathematical help since I lack in this department having only had the basic mathematics garnered through studying applied physics and quantum physics as part of electrical engineering.

Brainlet who does a little applied math here, I'm in op if you are serious.

big if true

>on Veeky Forums
>physics """""breakthrough"""""

Didn't even need to read to know it's bullshit. Fuck off with your dumb autist theories.

Sounds crap, try again brainlet

>ever since non-locality was proven by long distance "quantum-entanglement" demonstrations.

Entanglement DOESN'T disprove locality. Why would you even think it does? Do you even know what entanglement is? I'll give you a clue: it ISN'T "spooky action at a distance".

>>Copenhagen interpretation is wrong
>>Pilot-wave/De Broglie–Bohm theory is correct
That..... It's not a good start...

>>non-locality of pilot-wave is proven by quantum-entanglement
You can have quantum-entanglement in CI without non-locality.

>>my "model"
>I need mathematical help
Then, it's "my blah, blah, blah".

>>this anti-gravitation effect completely and exactly correlates with the exponential expansion of the universe
How do you know that without the math?

>>Thus my model also debunks "dark-energy"
Can your model explain the bullet cluster?

>>A model connecting pilot-wave non-locality with special relativity
Sorry, but locality is very important in Special Relativity (You cannot influence anything outside of your lightcone), so it would be difficult to join both.

>it would permanently remove all this "hocuspocus" quantum randomness bullshit and return physics to being completely deterministic again
Personally, I prefer to throw away determinism more than locality...

>I'm going to need some mathematics.
Idem. Although I think that the probability of this being bullshit is 99.99%

>If I'm correct it would permanently remove all this "hocuspocus" quantum randomness bullshit and return physics to being completely deterministic again.

Wont happen ever.

Locality is at the cornerstone of physical laws for more than a century, "quantum randomness" is unavoidable and both determinism AND realism belong in 19th century as obsolete ideas in physics.

Our universe is local, probabilistic and non-realist. Just because that is too much to handle for brainlets does not make it any less true.

>i did electric engineering
>this makes me a physicist
Background aside, how do you explain that the copenhagen interpretation gets so much right if it's wrong?
And if you have no real knowledge of mathematics needed to formulate your theory, it's not really going to be your theory is it?

This thread takes me back to my teenage years.

Me and my friends would come up with bizarre bullshit theories all the time.
There was one friend I had who particularly loved to come up with theories of the universe, how gravitation is caused by particles that hit objects and make them heavier, and if you move faster you gain more of these particles around you.

OP, I ain't saing you're wrong. But remember this:

"If you can't say it in math, it's just an opinion."

I'd bet $100 you don't know shit about quantum physics and OP's post just hurt your ego because you don't understand any of it

>Pilot-wave is correct
Well, didn't know why i expected more from an apllied physics grad. Please, learn some math, then read Polchinski. If you still think pilot-wave is anything but misunderstanding of basic QM principles, you are hopeless

You'd lose that bet, but since we both know you don't have $100 it's a moot point.

What's that pilotwave thing anyway?

>Our universe is local
But that's wrong. How do you explain quantum entanglement at a distance?

you can lie to me but not yourself

Where does the global network of social control derive its authority to prevent any public discussions about the math in the publications of my research program.

>vixra.org/author/jonathan_tooker

Not a physicist or mathematician myself but isn't all this Gibberish by a brainlet if not accompanied by some really advanced math? Isn't math the language of physics? I only see words here

Seems to be more of an interpretation of existing math that opens the door to new math explaining dark energy.

Yes. Words are fuzzy. It's impossible to formulate a precise, falsifiable model of physics without math.

>vixra
Always have a good laugh at the crackpot schizos doing 'science'. The best are those who typeset in msWord

>ever since non-locality was proven by long distance "quantum-entanglement"
No, correlation is not causation

>I need mathematical help

every single time. there's nothing wrong with quantum mechanics and never will be

This. How long until brainlets finally accept the quantum nature of our universe?

I don't understand why you won't share the details of your theory.

If you truly believe in your theory then just post the entirety of it with your name on social media and public scientific paper sharing platforms.

What games are you playing... the science game or the personal gain game? True scientists loves only science, not money and fame.

I don't work with people who do this type of stuff for money and fame. It's like trying to sail a boat with a bull afraid of water.

Literally every single scientist with a brain knows that Copenhagen is nonsense and pilot wave is correct. This is nothing new.

>>>/vixra/

An interpretation of QM with fatal misunderstanding of the observer

Yeah but from where does the network of global social control derive the authority required to get 100% of the comments to be about the name of the website and 0% about the math in the papers?

This. We're living in the simulation

Well at least they think that Copenhagen is nonsense and pilot wave has the potential to be the correct theory.

A friendly reminder that the universal wavefunction interpretation (many-worlds) is the most scientifically honest (least assumptions made) interpretation.

>gee becouse you cant do math it means copenhagen is true

You are sad. The both are theories, and copenhagen theory is the one with fairy tales.

>hey guys lets think there is many worls
>least assumptions
Oh man, cmon.

Can we just agree that pilot wave theory is the one that is not cutted off by Occam's razor?

>here is a short description of my past years of work
>provides a few lines of greentext

Kek. At least round earthers TRY to not sound retarded.

Please stop with the blind belief in Shmoit just because he's 'contrarian'(read: wrong)

make the math

guys i had a major breakthrough in physics with my model
>my model just says what I think is right and wrong without evidence and logic
>mfw im an engineer not a scientist

>"If you can't say it in math, it's just an opinion."
Opinions matter more than facts

Brainlets need to accept that the universe is in fact probabilstic and non-realist. There is no material reality, it's an illusion. That that makes you scared doesn't matter.

What a load of piggot oinkery.

The same reason nobody replies to you. None of us give enough of a shit to even read it, at best you're just good for a laugh.

OP, do you have at least a degree in physics or is this all just opinion. I mean, theres nothing wrong with opinion, for example, I think the Ricci Flow and the nontrivial zeros of the Riemannian Zeta Function are somehow related based off of a weird intuition, but do I have any reason to /really/ believe it? No. Will I ever have the ability to figure that shit out? No.

>be me
>physicist
>working my entire life to make a huge breakthrough like those physics legends all the normies know about
>finally make a discovery of the century
>gotta tell Veeky Forums!

Ok Mr. Max Karl Earnst Ludwig Planck

Why won't you praise me by name?

Shit dude, you look like a serial rapist.

Stay away from Veeky Forums if you have anything real to contribute. This place is just a shitposting central that throws the word brainlet around to make themselves feel superior. Don't expect any actual discourse to happen here.

>Don't expect any actual discourse to happen here.
There's no discourse because he hasn't shown us anything.

Many physicists have been working on droplets suspended in vibrational perturbations of oils baths for decades. They have demonstrated the double slit amongst other experiments. It only exists currently as a toy model and in now way indicates a pilot-wave interpretation on the microscopic level.

leaping to dark energy is not logical, and unsupported (try again)

>But that's wrong. How do you explain quantum entanglement at a distance?
How do you explain classical entanglement at a distance?
I put a red ball in a box, a blue ball in another box, and I give you one of the boxes but neither your or me know which ball is in the box. After that we open the boxes in a causally disconnected way, there you have classical entanglement without non-local interactions.

>Background aside, how do you explain that the copenhagen interpretation gets so much right if it's wrong?
>every single time. there's nothing wrong with quantum mechanics and never will be
These.

>I don't understand why you won't share the details of your theory.
Because then we will be laughing all day at him.

>Literally every single scientist with a brain knows that Copenhagen is nonsense and pilot wave is correct.
"Every single pseudoscientist with no actual knowledge of physics".

>Opinions matter more than facts
And that's how fake news are created.

You have an emotional attachment to deterministic realism, dont worry, it can be fixed by actually learning about quantum mechanics.

How are you gonna make bohmian mechanics Lorentz invariant

That's not how entanglement works moron.

electric engineers probably know the most about quantum mechanics because it's 80% of their work. Quantum tunneling in semiconductor design etc is what most electrical engineers get stamped in their heads during college.

I doubt it.

>I need mathematical help
You are a flat earther, and just don't know it.

You don't understand how the math works, thus find the results unintuitive, and thus claim you know better. Thus you're susceptible to all sorts of crackpot ideas to simplify things like Electric Universe theory and the like, simply because it proves you right, and the "establishment" wrong (and by "establishment" I mean folks who have actually learned this shit proper and poke holes in it for a living, rather than learned their shit from youtube videos).

I suppose there's some hope in that, if someone could walk you through the math, maybe you'd one day believe you were wrong all along... But, while you're clearly young, I think it's already too late for that.

phys.org/news/2015-03-particle.html

Or alternatively you could just take into account the actual physical structure of the universe and simply eliminate the need for hypothetical quantum magic factors like anti-gravity or dark energy.

ras.org.uk/news-and-press/2968-explaining-the-accelerating-expansion-of-the-universe-without-dark-energy

Bizarre claim you have there.

Especially the paper where the AvERA model without "dark energy" has a bigger exponential expansion than we observe. And then has the audacity to propose it as a replacement of dark energy.

Come back when the simulation actually approaches a similarity to our observations.

>That's not how entanglement works moron.
That's why I said classical entanglement, not quantum entanglement. The basic idea is there (knowing information from one of the boxes completely determines what we are going to get from the other box, even if they are causally disconected) without the subtleties of quantum mechanics.

It's completely unrelated to entanglement at all.

>My (potential) physics breakthrough
If YOU dont provide mathematics (AT EVERY POINT) what you are doing is NOT physics but pseudo-science or/and philosophy.

Despite what the pop-sci videos tell you, physics is the Mathematical description of the universe, if you have a ""theory"" but you dont have the mathematics to argue for it then you have absolutely nothing of value.

Boeing already achieved anti-gravity, enjoy being vanned. Never ever reveal something like this so unsecured. I already have your I.P. good work Nathan, see you in a few.

why though?

hi OP I'm an expert in triple integrals and finding non-trivial roots of second order polynomials, give me a call

Wait is this Brad Bohus?

I remember a dude saying he was the new copernicus handing out phamphlets, he claimed that you can't go to space because the friction would slow you down to much to escape to space.

>It's completely unrelated to entanglement at all.
Well, in my classical and simplified example you have found what the color of both balls is by measuring one of them and you clearly see that there is no transmission of information.

>tfw will never have crackpot theory of my own
>tfw will never have 90's style website explaining said crackpot theory

Why live?

theres still time

just do what OP did and read only every other word of some physics papers, then crackpot away

So here (), you say
>it would permanently remove all this "hocuspocus" quantum randomness bullshit

But here (), you say
>Chances of this happening are small

So is it deterministic or not?

Things can be deterministic and still be chance based. It just means that they aren't truly random.

You playing Russian roulette with yourself is still deterministic. But because you don't have the motor skills and capacity to calculate the exact motions and weight of the gun and its chanmbers you just reduce it to being chance based. But it's still deterministic in nature. You just don't know what action was determined to be the result.

>Well, in my classical and simplified example you have found what the color of both balls is by measuring one of them and you clearly see that there is no transmission of information.

no entropic transmission of information

>just another way of trying to prove God exists
>trying this hard to cope by denying the reality of our random and probabilistic universe

Then what loaded the gun in this case? Russian roulette is deterministic because it was shuffled, not randomized. In time-dependent unbound probability distributions, there must exist some amount of chance that an event does not happen after any arbitrarily large number of iterations. You can reconcile this by reshuffling the gun each time you pull the trigger, but at the end of it, the gun fired because the bullet was in that chamber. The existence of the bullet in the chamber is the deterministic variable.

If the quantum system is similarly deterministic, then what exactly is the deterministic variable?

>no entropic transmission of information
Where?

at the entangled particle you dont measure

>at the entangled particle you dont measure
No, they are causally disconnected, there cannot be transmission of information.

Retard
>what are bell's inequalities
>hurt durr negative time makes more sense than determinism

Stop being entitled to your so called "free will" and "probabilistic universe", but you're only making it harder for you and those around you.