Assume

>Quod erat demonstrandum

>as required

>furthermore

>black square

more like
>[math] \square [/math]

>Hence

There is literally nothing wrong with any of these.

>notice

the late Paul Sally, who taught in the math department at the University of Chicago for many years, literally signed his proofs with a little pirate face.

>maths

Assume I love these threads.
>let
No, I will not let "if and only if"
>Now, do
Don't. This completes the proof.

f(x) is a function, thenceforth think.
Quod erat demonstrandum, as required.
Furthermore, black square, more like [math]\square[/math].

Hence, there is literally nothing wrong with any of these.
Notice the late Paul Sally, who taught in the math department at the University of Chicago for many years, literally signed his proofs with a little pirate face.

This is remarkably coherent so far.

justify these

Someone mail this to Wildburger

fucking collective poetry

Next episode: Veeky Forums proves P = NP one sentence per post.

>we

>Apparently

>the

>Thus,

>∴

>hence
>we can rewrite the above as
>which is true by (1) and (2)
>this implies
>which is a contradiction

>definition

>we see

>tfw can't write a proof without using half of these

>it follows

>complain about rigor in this thread
>criticize a black woman for the lack thereof in another

Make up your god damn mind Veeky Forums.

what's this thread got to do with rigour user?

> [math]\forall[/math]

>[math] \Rightarrow [/math]

what are you, a rigor lover?

>I
Narcissism ruined science

>tfw all proofs in your language use "we", "let's" etc

Math was hard enough with just letters and numbers. But now they're adding upside down letters? Fuck that.

>criticize a black woman for trying to mix her ideology into mathematics.

>the reader

>it is straightforward to check that the following diagram is commutative

>by naturality,

>consider

You should consider suicide instead you faggot math problem

>the obvious map

>well
This isn't about farming you dumb dumb

dP/dt=baNP - dP

>brainlet report

*flashbacks to proof class*
*initiating flight or fight response*

god damn it these

>or otherwise

>(why?)

holy fuck

>(check this!).

>trivial

>tedious but straightforward

>":)" to mark a point in a proof.
>(exercise)
>more exactly ...
>writing [math]\land,\lor,\exists, \forall,\Rightarrow[/math] during text instead of writing out the words
>obviously ...
>calculate, qed.

>writing ∧,∨,∃,∀,⇒ during text instead of writing out the words
>tfw I like to do this, but my professors don't want it

Your professors are correct.

This one actually pisses me off too

was that necessary?

>writing mathematical text using mathematical notation
well that surely sucks

Anyone who doesn't use symbolic logic notation is a pleb. It's so crystal clear. I hate it when textbooks dance around it

>As any non brainlet can plainly see,

>>tfw I like to do this, but my professors don't want it
My professor is actually doing it himself occasionally.
"That's why /exists...".

[math] \forall x \in X, \exists y \in X \ni x = y [/math]

>given

>think
fuck off cunt i dont want to think

...

>suppose

>ergo

I do this because I get enjoyment out of writing cryptic symbols that plebs don't understand

>rigor

>clearly

>add

>minus

i thought it was
quite easily done

i groan whenever i see these