A Mathematician's Lament:

A Mathematician's Lament: maa.org/external_archive/devlin/LockhartsLament.pdf

The lament laments how maths are not taught in school - or universities, probably - and that a perverse mockery of it is taught instead.

Do you know any math books that fall somewhat within Lockhart's ideals?

Other urls found in this thread:

bookstore.ams.org/mcl-16/~~FreeAttachments/mcl-16-intro.pdf
bookstore.ams.org/mcl-17/~~FreeAttachments/mcl-17-pref.pdf
maa.org/external_archive/devlin/devlin_03_08.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>le math is beatiful and interesting meme
sure, there is some level of creativity involed later on
but if you can't follow highschool level stuff you will never get it anyway

Basically this, teaching math to people who can't get past highschool basic trivialties is like teaching to draw to people with tetraplegia, there is no point if you can't even hold the pen.

I read the entire thing.

I'm just glad this guy's not in control of mathematics education.

>can't get past highschool not-math means can't understand math

That's not a logically coherent argument!

Lockhart does point out in the latter parts of the lament that not everyone would be good at math if taught like he outlines, but opines that at least those attempted-taught would then at least know what math actually is.

>but if you can't follow highschool level stuff you will never get it anyway
meanwhile, seven year olds are being creative with their basic math learning

Props for reading the whole thing.
Curious as to what you have against his view - I thought the lament was very interesting, and good.

desu a book written like this seems painful to read

But that's the answer to the problem! You're supposed to come up with the answer yourself!

Pretty much any book

The difference is you have to do it on your own and have the right kind of autism to enjoy it

Alright, I've read it.

It reminded me of one of my favourite mathematicians who constantly argued about teaching mathematics (and who has written absolutely beautiful books), V. Arnold.

I think the author is retarded, though, because he assumes one fact which, if isn't true, destroys his reasoning completely: maths is taught at school so that students would learn math. This is false.

Thanks! I've skimmed V. Arnold's wikipedia page now, and looked through the web pages for some of his books.

( bookstore.ams.org/mcl-16/~~FreeAttachments/mcl-16-intro.pdf )

( bookstore.ams.org/mcl-17/~~FreeAttachments/mcl-17-pref.pdf )
>Seems to have parallells to the mathematical creativity mentioned in Lockhart's Lament, yup yup.

Sounds like they're absolutely beautiful books indeed. I'll probbly order those two and check them out! Thanks, user.