Stupid Question Thread /sqt/

WHAT THE FUCK IS "FIRST 9 WHOLE NUMBERS FROM THE RANGE OF VALUES"?!

IT DEPENDS ON FUCKING X.

WHAT THE FUCK?! PLEASE TELL ME FFS.

The median of this bullshit should be zero. Which IT FUCKING ISN'T HOWEVER YOU TRY IT FFS.

I need a method to study abstract proof based math

I'm going through my first class with it and the proofs on exams are killing me and it takes me forever to go through the homework

My professor says I present a lot of logical but not-quite-correct ideas in my work and office hours and that I simply must practice my proofs more

But how! There are no answers in the book and I rarely know if I'm 100% correct when I write something. How do you practice writing proofs effectively

So basically a domain is like the lego bricks that make up a magnet, right? Meaning if I split one Lego made of 20 blocks I just get two blocks made of 10 Legos instead. But what if I divide those as well to the point I end up with 20 blocks of one Lego each. And then hammer each individual Lego. I was thinking about that "quanta" thing, that energy is stored in packs that cannot be divided. So following the analogy does the magnetic field just stop existing altogether?

Why is there a difference of voltage when resistors are in series, but not in parallel?

The closed form solution is [math]y = x^2 - x[/math], but your question makes no real sense. The range of the polynomial is -1 to infinity, so it could mean {-1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}, the median of thse values being 3. The only other thing it could mean is if your function was a probability density function, which it isnt. So you're probably better off asking your teacher/lecturer/whoever what their vague ass question means instead of yelling at us.

How come there are so many foods that are perfectly okay for humans to eat but can be harmful or even fatal to dogs and cats even in small quantities?

Are there any foods that dogs and cats can eat that are fatal humans? Or do we don't know because we usually don't feed our pets things that kill us?

Why wouldn't this scenario break the law of conservation of energy?
>You have a gun that shoot a bullet at 100m/s
>You can run forward at 5m/s
>You run at 5m/s and shoot the gun at the same direction you are running at
>The bullet goes 105m/s

Since [eqn]KE=1/2mv^2[/eqn], why does the kinetic energy that takes to run at 5m/s from 0m/s, also make something go from 100m/s to 105m/s when there is a squared relationship on velocity?

someone please answer this

>The reason here is that there are less electrons in hydrogen and they repel each other lesser than flourine would do.
thanks bb

voltage across what?