Lebesgue integration is a meme

>Not using Daniell integration

Formal integration is a meme anyway. All the interesting and worthwhile integration is done numerically.

Except for the fact it is way more useful because it can be formulated on any measure space.

So many doesn't seem to get it, I really don't understand the difficulty with it.

This, if you care about analytic solutions you're an autist with no skin in the game.

>it's 2017 and there isn't a method to exactly measure the area under a curve

every valid numerical technique is justified using formal integration. The error bounds are proved using formal integration.

>not using john gabriel's integration formulas.

>Not using Tai's Method

And how you define area under a curve without integrals