Debate in uni

Humans were a mistake.
t. god

>implying god posts on this tibetan fingerpainting forum
>implying that if he did he would ever leave r9k

I feel sick

Many debates limit the amount of interjections, maybe even ban them. Which is a little retarded because whoever goes last always has the advantage even in a "A's opening statement->B's opening statement->A's retort, B's retort->A's retort retort->B's retort retort etc." model regardless of how many times you repeat the iteration. But it does keep things from just being a shouting match, although personally, I've seen a handful of refereed debates and many people having arguments about Veeky Forums shit, and the shouting matches easily are more entertaining to watch and generally cover the topic way more thoroughly.

Fuck off and false flag elsewhere /pol/lack

This BS doesnt even happen in fucking Sweden

>my way of debating is superior
>that's why I lost
>if you beat your opponents, they win

Honestly if you can't dismantle B's arguments by the second round, you deserve to lose. A proper debate is decided in the second round by how well A both defends his arguments from B's refutations and refutes any new points that B has discussed. If A has valid points, they'll know how to defend them from first level refutations. If they're a good debater, they'll refute future arguments before they start based on how B refuted them in the first round. Anything further than that is just circlejerking with "YUH HUH NUH UH YUH HUH NUH UH..."

>he's never had a tenured professor who was opinionated
Just two weeks ago my roommate watched as one of his professors called up a single student that supported Trump and had the entire class "debate" him at once by putting him up front and having people ask him questions and them refute his answers.

>refereed debates
Then I guess we need more of those if they don't allow interjections.
Otherwise it turns in what OP described

Also yeah, in every single system of course who goes last has more advantage, you cannot change it.
You could moderate the advantage though

Are you for real or just false flagging too?

>Are you for real or just false flagging too?
No matter what answer I give it won't affect your decision to believe me or not. If it does, you're an idiot.