It's a shit book to learn from, but it's GOAT for reference. Keep it.
Found this in my apartment building's laundry room. Is it a good book to learn C with or is it outdated?
Xavier Campbell
Colton Cooper
It's a bit outdated, but essential. Hopefully you got the pictured version; the pre-ANSI versions didn't auto-destruct and are even more outdated.
Bentley Phillips
>"This book on C is overrated"
>"Yeah well that one is deprecated!"
ITT: stupid faggots who dont understand C itself is deprecated by C++, and the documentation for C++ is very well laid out.
>inb4 your wrong, ect
Nah, im not.
Daniel Baker
>C itself is deprecated by C++
C and C++ are very different languages, with different strengths. Claiming one is a replacement for the other indicates that you really don't understand either of them.
Michael Nguyen
t. High school student
Connor James
C's only strength is being able to be compiled into tiny executables. If you have such size constraints pure assembly is almost always better than C.
So pretty much this
Matthew Jackson
C: A Reference Manual (Harbison & Steele) and Modern C (Gustedt) beat it in that by far.
Brody Davis
Dr. Archibald has some pretty decent videos that go over the important things.
Liam Moore
then what the fuck do you read if you want to "learn programming?"
is the meme book still SICP?