>1: there is a fuckton of literally invisible matter out there that has no reason for existing and no known way to function
>2: our theories on gravity dont work on larger scales
why do scientists claim 1 is more likely?
1: there is a fuckton of literally invisible matter out there that has no reason for existing and no known way to...
Liam Price
Hudson Garcia
because our theories on gravity do work on larger scales?
Nolan Martinez
Well:
>There's no reason to believe every particle use every possible interaction
>Cold dark matter is incredibly predictive
Mason Lopez
>discrepancy so enormous you have to invent a placeholder matter that composes of more exotic matter than there is normal matter in the entire universe.
Hunter Nguyen
Read Hossenfelder's blog, she goes into detail on this without being too biased. Put simply it could still go either way.
Aaron Roberts
>Hossenfelder's blog
Get the fuck out you fucking brainlet.
John Mitchell
I'll admit I don't know too much about relativity, but what's wrong with the blog?
Jeremiah Ross
She's middle of the road on fucking everything. And this is a perfect example, CDM is incredibly predictive for such a simple hypothesis, no other model/hypothesis/theory comes close to it. Yet despite its success she still (according to you) says it could go either way. No, I'm sorry but current evidence points in favour of CDM.
Levi Adams
>maths incredibly off
>assumptions must be right
>calculations are right
>qed faeries exist.
Obviously ya'all clapped too hard.
Luke Allen
This always really bothered me about dark matter, but I always sort of assumed that greater minds than mine had better reasons than simple balancing their equations with their observations. to claim that a wholly intangible thing exists in great quantities throughout the universe.