Since /pol/ is just shitpostung and shills I will ask here.
Can someone who is for the paris deal tell me why without basically telling me that white european nations have to carry the world on their backs because reasons?
The rights arguement is that it's a shit deal for us and even if the deal was fair it will only decrease global warming by a fraction of a percent by 2100.
Other urls found in this thread:
nytimes.com
obamawhitehouse.archives.gov
nobelprize.org
earthjournalism.net
unfccc.int
youtube.com
oecd.org
en.wikipedia.org
skepticalscience.com
en.wikipedia.org
latimes.com
nypost.com
thehill.com
climatechangenews.com
theguardian.com
en.wikipedia.org
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
washingtonpost.com
washingtonpost.com
c2es.org
nytimes.com
historic-uk.com
nera.com
twitter.com
Check the catalog you retarded monkey.
it doesn't demand enough from China. they get a free pass until 2030. because "china is a developing nation meme".
it wants to give billions in development aid to countries known for fraud, waste, and abuse of foreign aid.
allows certain developing nations to claim victim status due to climate change. (evil western industry flooded our sand bar of a nation. give refugee immigration and welfare please).
it doesn't view climate change as a business opportunity to make everyone more productive and richer. instead takes a socialist view. that the rich have to pay for everything.
The best thing about the deal was that it satisfied a call to action on the subject that was tangible and readily felt. Like many other things people rush to cast a vote on before thinking it through, the quality of outcome was secondary to the urgency to act.
it really didn't go far enough. it was still stuck in the past of Carbon Emission Reductions.
it mentions carbon sinking. though has no call to take on active geo engineering to increase carbon sinking.
Look it up yourself.
$100 billion per year until 2020 as welfare payments to "developing nations" to build emissions reduction targets in said 'developing' nations (though many who classify as developing are richer than the UK/Australia combined).
There's many more payments, all of them benefit some tinpot dictator somewhere who will spend it on robes like the king of Swaziland and by 2020 there will be nothing to show for all those billions spent.
I thought Veeky Forums was supposed to be smart. Maybe brush up on your reading comprehension you mongoloids.
I don't think this thread would have any replies if it was only people who supported it.
Please enlighten us about how this was ever a good idea.
He's criticizing everyone's reading comprehension
>Can someone who is for the paris deal tell me why
>someone who is for