What did Paris Climate Accord mean by this?

>"Acknowledging that climate change is a common concern of humankind, Parties should, when taking action to address climate change, respect, promote and consider their respective obligations on human rights, the right to health, the rights of indigenous peoples, local communities, migrants, children, persons with disabilities and people in vulnerable situations and the right to development, as well as gender equality, empowerment of women and intergenerational equity,"

Other urls found in this thread:

unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>the rights of indigenous peoples
White people deserve to die
>migrants
White people deserve to die.
> empowerment of women
Men deserve to die.

What else do you need to know?

source?

basically if you find it hard to understand why socialists push woman children and browns into everything you need to know some things about our human psychology first.

the reason why we never say "people from all over walks of life" is because society preference is to protect and serve the weak on the expanse of the strong has always been a thing. soldiers die in wars, fireman put out fires, doctors endanger their themselves too all for the sake of the weak on the expanse of the healthy and strong.
this is why our society is degenerating. we should train and teach people how to be stronger than assist everyone who is in need. a good example for that is how people of certain color or background get more human rights than those who don't have these characteristics. this is not by confidence. we view strong healthy capable men as disposable and that's one of the biggest secrets in human psychology that they never tell us.

sorry about my grammer, im a little woozy

>source?
from the PCA document itself dum dum
unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf

fist page, bottom pargagraph

Saving the environment and making the world a better place are not mutually exclusive. They are actually the same thing.

>save the world by allowing unlimited 3rd world immigration into countries with predominantly white people will make the world a better place
Fuck you and fuck non-whites.

What the libturds always want: white man's suffering.

I'm really happy that Trump didn't sign the (bad) deal.

You realize that its not about immigration and is more about the fact that large pollution emitters tend to locate themselves in cheap areas where vulnerable people (i.e. poor people) live right? Thats the whole logic behind the environmental justice movement, that socioeconomic status shouldn't dictate if you're exposed to carcinogens and other stuff.

Not everything is an immigration boogeyman.

>its not about immigration
>without immigration to america the only emissions from america would be few indians smoking their ceremonial pipes

So?

So the immigration IS the boogeyman. Trump aka Drumpf is a german immigrant of few generations.

With more immigration to the USA, you can expect more carbon emissions etc.

>human rights
immediately discarded

>migrant, gender equality, empowerment of women
as if the cult of (((human rights))) wasn't enough

A) that isnt necessarily true although its certainly likely that more people in the Americas will lead to more carbon,

B) that isn't really an argument to what said anyway.

Fact of the matter is: the Paris >>>>>Climate

can you stop? you guys don't have any evidence of this. you are just acting on emotion

Whatever. My solution to the climate change:

1. stop immigration to the west
2. nuke India
3. deny food aid from africans


I'm with Trump

Sage

the rights of the indigenous people, except those indigenous to Europe.

Nah I'm sure that the roma will be protected under this too!

not an argument

Whatever. My solution to the climate change:

1. stop immigration to the west
2. nuke America to lower temperatures by 10 degrees Celsius
3. make heartwarming movies about how America saved the world again

I'm with ISIS