Greatest Philosophers through the Centuries

>Heidegger

This guys a cuck

you're the cuck

JP is a hack. So many people on lit sucking his dick like they did with Harris before him.

>JP is a hack.

Why? Seems like you're a triggered transfaggot/female t b h f a m.

He's captured the anti-SJW and is riding that currently. But that whole wave is such a saturated meme. He's not bringing anything original to the table, at all. If he ever publishes any decent works then I'll re-assess. Until then he's Milo-faggot level crap.

I wish this board wasn't entirely meme spewing shitposters

go read maps of meaning

>naming continentals only

There's your problem. The real order goes something like:

19th: Frege
20th: Wittgenstein
21st: Kripke

>comparing a doctor with a faggot
nice standards dude

Really? That's the only thing you can say about him? At least try to say something about his philosophy & opinions on mythology, religion and morality. Again, you're just slandering and shaming him because you're a spineless leftist.

Shall read it next, cheers

And apparently if I'm not too much a fan of someone that automatically makes me a leftist, kek. Thought we were on lit, not infowars.

In regards to his philosophy... Some parts I agree with, others I think are pretty much retarded. He's got that Peter Hitchens-like view when it comes to religion in some sense. People seem to have a problem with separating values from the Bible and what they think they should feel about religion. JP is obsessed with viewing Jesus as a meta hero of sorts, claiming him to be an amalgamation of all the good we should strive for (fair's fair), but imo all of that should be separated from the religious aspect. You can aspire without belief. If you're an adult and still believe in something when there's absolutely no proof, you're a hack.

Also, quite amusing asking me about his thoughts on religion when he obsesses over the representation of Jesus and then calling me a leftist, double kek

>You can aspire without belief. If you're an adult and still believe in something when there's absolutely no proof, you're a hack.
Yes, but has JP ever said he believes in it? You seem to have trouble seperating belief and religion

*separating

...

>He's got that Peter Hitchens-like view when it comes to religion in some sense.

This is so wrong. I have no idea where to begin.

What makes him obsessed?

>You can aspire without belief. If you're an adult and still believe in something when there's absolutely no proof, you're a hack.

You missed a couple lectures. He deals with these exact statements.

>If you're an adult and still believe in something when there's absolutely no proof, you're a hack.

>If you're an adult and still believe in something when there's absolutely no proof, you're a hack.
KEK
>he believes with certainty there is no god
>he hasn't read Kierkegaard
kys, >>>>>>>>>>>>/reddit/>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>Hegel/Nietzsche
>Wittgenstein/Sellars
>Brandom/Rödl

>6th century BC
Pythagoras
>5th century BC
Heraclitus
>4th century BC
Plato (Aristotle close second)
>3rd BC
Zeno
>2nd BC
Carneades
>1st BC
Cicero (Lucretius second)
>1st century AD
Plutarch (Seneca and Epicetus equal second)
>2nd AD
Aurelius
>3rd AD
Plotinus
>4th AD
St Ambrose
>5th AD
St Augustine
>6th AD
Boethius
>7th AD
?
>8th AD
Alcuin of York
>9th AD
(John Scotus) Eriugena
>10th AD
Al-Farabi
>11th AD
Anselm of Canterbury
>12th AD
Averroes
>13th AD
Thomas Aquinas
>14th AD
William of Ockham
>15th AD
Pico della Mirandola
>16th AD
Luther (Machiavelli and Bacon equal second)
>17th AD
Hobbes (Spinoza and Descartes equal second, Leibniz 3rd, Locke 4th)
>18th AD oh boy here we go
Hume (Kant second, Burke 3rd, Rousseau 4th)
>19th AD OH BOY
Nietzsche (Hegel second, Kierkegaard third, De Maistre 4th, Carlyle 5th)
>20th AD too easy
Evola (Heidegger second, Jung third, Spengler 4th)
>21st AD
JONATHAN BOWDEN RIP

>Evola
lol

>Bowden
>Philosopher
LOL

Yeah that last one was a meme. The 21st century is too young to give a serious answer but if I were to chose one it'd be Nick Land pick related

But still, I miss Bowden :(

Lol he fucking hates marxists and the likes. He's not riding a wave, it's just that his views coincide with anti-SJWism. Which is of course prevalent nowadays since SJWism is also prevalent.

>anaphil
Spergyburger

>I know of this name from this century! Better put it down.

Evola is great

Until Moly writes a book or something over 200 pages long I will consider him a pseud

>He's not riding a wave
youtube.com/watch?v=Ixc9i1G7eew

>riding that

is he though? He has a lot more to him than just being an anti-SJW like a lot of youtubers. His videos on race realism, HBD and religion are also very good introductions for beginners and even have material that intermediaries find useful

>His videos on race realism
can you post a link?

>anti-SJW is a meme

You're in for a surprise user. It's not a fad, it's not a fad and it's not going anywhere. Ant-SJW sentiment is spreading like wildfire and will soon be the norm. Deus vult.

>Memeiavelli on par with Bacon

Damn the 16th was good though with both Bacon and Luther.

He's written a number of books and real time relationships is 378 pages.

cdn.media.freedomainradio.com/feed/books/RTR/Real_Time_Relationships_by_Stefan_Molyneux_PDF.pdf

Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argumennt.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an arguement.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.
Not an argument.

youtube.com/watch?v=hU49o6zA5eo

what the fuck dude calm down lmao

Not an argument.