Are these two scientists right about nuclear power?

Are these two scientists right about nuclear power?
youtu.be/MHpHYde2VVE?t=25m52s

Other urls found in this thread:

thorconpower.com/docs/ct_yankee.pdf
google.com/?q=why not launch radioactive waste into space
forbes.com/sites/realspin/2014/10/01/why-doesnt-u-s-recycle-nuclear-fuel/#37b5e9fe390f
nei.org/Issues-Policy/Used-Nuclear-Fuel-Management/Recycling-Used-Nuclear-Fuel
heritage.org/environment/commentary/recycling-nuclear-fuel-the-french-do-it-why-cant-oui
nature.com/news/2009/090702/full/news.2009.619.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friends_of_the_Earth
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Orville_Anderson
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARCO
youtu.be/PekJU6YpaNA?t=25m52s
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Nuclear power is a meme that people only support to look smarter.

Like, I'm all for Bill Nye, but why are you calling him a "scientist" in this context? Also, Bernie is also similarly great, but this is one his huge blind spots, and AFAIK IIRC he's not a scientist either. Not gonna watch it. It's just as bad as garden variety climate change deniers.

>why are you calling him a "scientist" in this context
He means to imply it's non-scientists that have created the global warming hoax or whatever

plus he hates bill nye and sanders

>nuclear shill is here
You're not gonna watch because you have no way to refute their points.

Yes I do. For example, the few seconds I watched, Bill Nye said that nuclear is bad because it takes a long time to license. Well, that seems like an eminently solvable problem: change the licensing to not take 15 or 20 years. Then, Sanders mentioned the so-called problem of nuclear waste. There is no such problem. It's a fiction. A myth. A thing spouted by Green people that has no basis in actual fact.
thorconpower.com/docs/ct_yankee.pdf

What are their points? Not gonna watch some stupid video.

>He doesn't about timestamps
Your opinion is worthless give how clueless you are.

you'd have to keep that waste buried for an amount of time equivalent to 10 roman empires...
that's just preposterous. no human institution has ever last even remotely that long and never will.

Other industries make toxic waste that is dangerous FOREVER! Yet no one ever talks about the need to ensure that it remains contained to these same absurd standards.

Nuclear waste is toxic waste just like any other. Sure, it's a more dangerous than most other kinds of toxic waste, but we make cost benefit decisions all the time when we generate toxic waste.

The problem fundamentally relies on this pernicious myth that nuclear waste is magically super-dangerous, and that if you let it, it will seep into the environment and kill everyone, no matter how diluted. It's bullshit. I really suggest that you read my link.

thorconpower.com/docs/ct_yankee.pdf