Who can think of the biggest number?

>smallest infinite cardinal
>biggest number

-1/12 + 1
btfo

10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10

that should do the trick

Infinity plus 1

(-1/12)^(-1/12)

Take this

99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999996999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999699

woah, these are some big numbers

Ok. This thread convinced me to take a break from Veeky Forums until the end of summer.

There are more Human Genders than Atoms in the Universe

Sources are the Shit Tier Pop Science:
Bill Nye, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Veritasium (Derek Muller), Michael from VSauce, Numberphile, Seeker, SciShow, Minutephysics, AsapSCIENCE, Periodic Videos, Khan Academy, Crash Course, Michio Kaku

Cocking nora.

The Infinity of both natural numbers and integers with numerical symbols added to each number as infinity progresses. Different levels of infinity

according to tyson the biggest number would be the fifth level of infinity

the number of genders^the number of genders

The limit of infinity to the power of infinity as infinity goes to infinity

The real question is, what´s the smallest positive number other than zero?

It's the infinitesimal 0.000...0001

1 smidgen

the sum of my positive contribution to society

I think he meant large positive numbers not large negative

He said positive dumb dumb

>"Give me largest/smallest number you can construct"
>brainlets proceed to write infinity and infinitesimals
These are not numbers in any number system that matters.

>other than zero

Easy, watch this
1/99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999

___________________________
2

Let x and y be the largest number and the nonzero number closest to zero, respectively, in this thread. Let z = max{|x|,1/|y|}. Then z is the largest number in this thread and 1/z is the nonzero number closest to zero in this thread.

1/(ur mums weight)

N-NANI!?

[math]99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99^{99}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}[/math]

Sum of all Veeky Forums anons IQ combined.

999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999

That's not very much.

BB(999999999999)

This. Anyone who claims a non-ordinal should go back to middle school.

[eqn]\underbrace{\omega_{\omega_{\ddots_{\omega_{\Xi\left( \ell \right)}}}}}_{\Xi\left( \ell \right)\text{ times }\omega}[/eqn]
where [math]\ell[/math] denotes the Little Bigeddon, the largest confirmed googologism, defined here:
sites.google.com/site/largeordinums/numbers/little-bigeddon
and [math]\Xi[/math] denotes the Ξ function introduced here:
cp4space.wordpress.com/2013/01/06/fast-growing-4/

It includes mine so yes it is.

>implying I'm not carrying the rest of you brainlets

>posting on sci

Let x be the largest number.

x

I don't think you should be the one to talk here friendo seeing as you misunderstand even basic terminology :^)

The hell is wrong with Periodic Videos?

>feeling the need to post an explanation of aleph0
Did you learn about it literally today or something?

[math]\frac{1}{\varepsilon}[/math]

Jonathan Bowers' Utter Oblivion

Is infinity considered to be a number?

user asked for BIGGEST number, that is a number as a quantity. We are talking about cardinals more than ordinals

Winner

[math]\epsilon_0[/math]

DON'T YOU FUCKING DARE. Infinitely small numbers have no implication or don't even exist. Not even in theoretical maths.

also, Grahams number

[math]G^{G^{G^{G^{G^{G^{G^{G^{G^{G^{G^{G^{G^G}}}}}}}}}}}}[/math]

Where G is Graham's number

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham's_number

Let's define the following function called big. Big takes two arguments. Big(1000,2) = 1000^1000. Big(10,3) = 10^10^10. Big(2,4) = 2^2^2^2., Etc. So I give you a very large number. big(big(big(90000,90000),90000),90000)

>Not even in theoretical maths
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-standard_analysis

Non standard analysis and diferential forms aren't built up on proper mathenatical intuition, but rather on previous results. Basically, they force shit to work in some way because they already know the answer.

What? Aren't you confusing it with the shit people did with analysis before limits were introduced?

No, that shit is perfectly rigorous and useful don't get me wrong, but I don't think it should be thought without having a typical analysis class because it's constructed in a certain way because we already have the answers thank to analysis, by this I mean that the proper groundwork has been done, so we can start to define this mathematical objects that also fit those results, but makes the process much easier. My point is people who think physicists/engineers should only learn this type of shit because of the amount of infinitesimals they use.

This

Nine finity you twerp

Who is the semen demon in this picture

she's called Margherita

what about TREE(4)

>Let x be the largest number.
>x

Winner

ur mums weight
ur dick

TREE(3)→TREE(3)→TREE(3)→TREE(3)...TREE(3)→

where the length of this sequence is equal to:

TREE(3)→TREE(3)→TREE(3)→TREE(3)...TREE(3)→

where the length of this sequence is equal to:

TREE(3)→TREE(3)→TREE(3)→TREE(3)...TREE(3)→
.
.
.

where the height of this shit is equal to the smallest number bigger than any number that can be named by an expression in the language of first order set-theory with less than the number of symbols equal to the googolth element in the busy beaver function.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway_chained_arrow_notation

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayo's_number

yeah all of that plus 1
and 3 number 5s and a large diet coke

TREE(the number this nigga just said)

>literally plus 1

(biggest number in this thread) + 0.00001

Fuck you

What he said + [math]\varepsilon[/math]

Let n be the maximum of all numbers posted in this thread, excluding this post.

Let i = n+1 .

i.

i+1

infinity / 0

an infinitely long number

Ah yes, this thread reminds me of childhood, of arguing with my brother.

>tfw epsilon is negative

grahams number?

Let [math]a^b[/math] = [math]a \uparrow b[/math]
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knuth's_up-arrow_notation

Let Googolplex = [math]10^{10^100}[/math] = [math]10 \uparrow (10 \uparrow 100)[/math]
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googolplex

x = Googolplex [math] \uparrow [/math]

Errata:

Let [math]a^b[/math] = [math]a \uparrow b[/math]
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knuth's_up-arrow_notation

Let Googolplex = [math]10^{10^{100}}[/math] = [math]10 \uparrow 10 \uparrow 100}[/math]
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googolplex

x = Googolplex [math] \uparrow [/math] Googolplex

Shit fucked up Latex again

One more try.

Errata:

Let [math] a^b [/math] = [math] a \uparrow b [/math]
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knuth's_up-arrow_notation

Let Googolplex = [math] 10^{10^{100}} [/math] = [math] 10 \uparrow 10 \uparrow 100 [/math]
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googolplex

x = Googolplex [math] \uparrow [/math] Googolplex

G

(Largest number in the thread barring this post) +1

Yes.

let above be x, then y = x + 1

heh
>your moves kiddo

Unobtainable cardinal

sum of the absolute values of all numbers ITT including those posted here in the future

:^)

PRODUCT of the absolute values of all numbers ITT including those posted here in the future

:i)

10 fingers plus 10 toes.

0

(v:

...

oh fug